Newservers and their retention

Hi,

This may help some people comparing news posts.
Really shows how poor some isp's retention is.

I guess you get what you pay for.

zeebop

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:25:44 +0100, zeebop <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>This may help some people comparing news posts.
>Really shows how poor some isp's retention is.
>
>I guess you get what you pay for.

WFT are you on about?

--
www.senaction.com

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:25:44 +0100, zeebop <(E-Mail Removed)> strung
together this:

>Hi,
>
>This may help some people comparing news posts.
>Really shows how poor some isp's retention is.
>
>I guess you get what you pay for.
>
Well, that's cleared that up then.
--

SJW
A.C.S. Ltd

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:25:44 +0100, zeebop <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>This may help some people comparing news posts.
>Really shows how poor some isp's retention is.
>
>I guess you get what you pay for.
>
>zeebop

oh yeah - meant to post a url so you can compare.
http://www.techpost.co.uk/news/

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:32:33 +0100, guv <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:25:44 +0100, zeebop <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>This may help some people comparing news posts.
>>Really shows how poor some isp's retention is.
>>
>>I guess you get what you pay for.
>
>WFT are you on about?

WTF is WFT?

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:02:45 GMT, SteveL <(E-Mail Removed)>
strung together this:

>WTF is WFT?

WFT is what fucking toss. I'd have used WTF though, WFT is a bit zany
and off the wall for me.
--

SJW
A.C.S. Ltd

On 29 Aug 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, zeebop wrote:

>oh yeah - meant to post a url so you can compare.
>http://www.techpost.co.uk/news/

thanks... glad I sometimes get here 'late'