On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:48:26 GMT, John Navas
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
><http://www.theregister.com/2007/10/22/zen_ar7_infineon_bt_fault/>:
>
> One of the UK's best-respected broadband providers has raised
> concerns about the reliability of the world's most popular ADSL chip.
>
> Zen Internet has uncovered a potential problem with the Texas
> Instruments AR7. The chip is at the heart of about a third of routers
> in use worldwide today - including Linksys and Netgear kit.
>
> Zen has told its customers not to buy models that contain the chip
> because they provide an unstable connection.
>
> [MORE]
>
>Incomplete list of some of the dozens of routers that contain the chip:
><http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/AR7>
My Actiontec GT-704 is as stable as a rock(AR7 chipset), uptime since
last config change 91days. And I've got one of the worst lines in DSL
hell..
So far this modem is of the best (S/N wise.. connection
reliability, performance), I've ever run into (verses 6 other DSL
modems)..
P.S. Their is a nasty DNS bug in th eGT-704.. But I've shut off that
service.
Meanwhile, Bellsouth/AT&T keeps on splicing in more and more junk
into my 11,500ft underground loop. BS measurements now indicate that
it's a 26,000 ft loop.
BT's weak point is that it uses the defective PPPoX protocol on top of
the ATM bridging functionality. .
That makes the whole setup highly vulnerable to anything less than a
perfect connection. BS/AT&T compensates for this built-in weakness
by increasing the interleave factor(Noise profile) to 16
milliseconds.. (which sucks big time.)
Note to gamers: A 16ms interleave ratio adds 32ms to the round trip
time of any packet sent to/from your IP address..
And each time their is a packet lost, the PPPoX connection is broken
and must be re-negioated/restarted. (Big time disruption. several
seconds + TCP timeouts & retries)
Fortunately, I've got a bridged (no PPPoX), 2ms interleaved connection
through Covad.. and a few dropouts don't bother my low latency
connection to the net.
|