Might try removing filesystems from the equation for a while and just
use netperf or ttcp. Having said that, if there is a duplex problem
that seems to manifest as perf issues in one direction but not the
other.
Sometimes, that stems from misunderstanding autoneg:
How Autoneg is supposed to work:
When both sides of the link are set to autoneg, they will "negotiate"
the duplex setting and select full duplex if both sides can do
full-duplex.
If one side is hardcoded and not using autoneg, the autoneg process
will "fail" and the side trying to autoneg is required by spec to use
half-duplex mode.
If one side is using half-duplex, and the other is using full-duplex,
sorrow and woe is the usual result.
So, the following table shows what will happen given various settings
on each side:
Auto Half Full
Auto Happiness Lucky Sorrow
Half Lucky Happiness Sorrow
Full Sorrow Sorrow Happiness
Happiness means that there is a good shot of everything going well.
Lucky means that things will likely go well, but not because you did
anything correctly

Sorrow means that there _will_ be a duplex
mis-match.
When there is a duplex mismatch, on the side running half-duplex you
will see various errors and probably a number of late collisions. On
the side running full-duplex you will see things like FCS errors.
Note that those errors are not necessarily conclusive, they are simply
indicators.
If you are connecting to a real _hub_ that means half-duplex only.
However, if it is actually a _switch_ then it probably can do
full-duplex.
rick jones
--
Wisdom Teeth are impacted, people are affected by the effects of events.
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...

feel free to post, OR email to raj in cup.hp.com but NOT BOTH...