Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Networking Between Buildings

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Networking Between Buildings

 
 
TheScullster
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 10:22 AM
Hi All

Not sure that this is the best group, but hopefully someone will have
experience.

My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building and
I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some members of
staff will be moving to the new location.
The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and footpaths
separating them.
It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.
What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx cost?

Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?
Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!

TIA

Phil


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
TheSingingCat
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 02:34 PM
Personally, I would not be keen on running wireless... but maybe that's just
me, I like cables

If the building is only 15m apart, I would call the city out and have them
do an analysis on the ground for exisiting wires, water lines etc...
They'll paint all obstacles. Then have a little bobcat come out and just
trench a foot down or so from building to building. This 'access' road, is
it paved? If so, you may have to forget my bobcat idea Anyhow, if you
an lay it down, I'd run conduit in the trench and and wire the offices
directly.

Failing that, search for wireless solutions Good luck though, this sort
of stuff is actually pretty fun coming up with solutions.


"TheScullster" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi All
>
> Not sure that this is the best group, but hopefully someone will have
> experience.
>
> My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building and
> I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
> Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some members

of
> staff will be moving to the new location.
> The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and

footpaths
> separating them.
> It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
> additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.
> What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx cost?
>
> Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
> How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
> 100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?
> Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!
>
> TIA
>
> Phil
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Cleve S.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 03:06 PM
I'd stay away from wireless, and wires too. I'm in South Florida where
there's plenty of lightning. I wouldn't have anything but fiber running
between buildings.

Media converters should run about $300 for both ends, 6 pair fiber is about
$1 a foot, 1 meter fiber patch cables about $70 for 2. You'll want 2 wall
cabinets, $100 to $150 each. They get a lot of money to terminate the ends,
$35 seems to stick in my head, so $280 for a pair & a spare. Altogether
$1,000 or so for hardware, not including running the cable.

If you can't dig can you run an overhead cable? Hope I haven't added to the
confusion.

Cleve

"TheSingingCat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:40d058ee$1_2@news....
> Personally, I would not be keen on running wireless... but maybe that's

just
> me, I like cables
>
> If the building is only 15m apart, I would call the city out and have them
> do an analysis on the ground for exisiting wires, water lines etc...
> They'll paint all obstacles. Then have a little bobcat come out and just
> trench a foot down or so from building to building. This 'access' road,

is
> it paved? If so, you may have to forget my bobcat idea Anyhow, if you
> an lay it down, I'd run conduit in the trench and and wire the offices
> directly.
>
> Failing that, search for wireless solutions Good luck though, this

sort
> of stuff is actually pretty fun coming up with solutions.
>
>
> "TheScullster" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hi All
> >
> > Not sure that this is the best group, but hopefully someone will have
> > experience.
> >
> > My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building

and
> > I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
> > Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some members

> of
> > staff will be moving to the new location.
> > The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and

> footpaths
> > separating them.
> > It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
> > additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.
> > What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx cost?
> >
> > Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
> > How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
> > 100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?
> > Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 04:22 PM
Another option - make sure there's decent Internet connectivity in each
location & create a VPN site link between the two networks. I usually do
this with two Sonicwalls, but you could do it with many other
routers/firewalls....

TheScullster wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Not sure that this is the best group, but hopefully someone will have
> experience.
>
> My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building
> and I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
> Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some
> members of staff will be moving to the new location.
> The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and
> footpaths separating them.
> It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
> additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.
> What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx
> cost?
>
> Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
> How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
> 100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?
> Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!
>
> TIA
>
> Phil



 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 04:26 PM
Fiber is what we used too and it has worked out great. I don't know the
cost,...it was completed before I worked here. I believe now-a-days they
have machines that can drill down and across the road without having to dig.
So you trench up to the edge on each side and then drill under to get
across.

We ran ours overhead because there was already an overhead rack and conduit
in place. One building has an old 600ft TV Broadcast tower and the other
building has the transmitter, so the rack was already there to carry the
Rigid Coax across to the Tower. By using Fiber we didn't have to worry
about any EM or RF interference.

--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


"Cleve S." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'd stay away from wireless, and wires too. I'm in South Florida where
> there's plenty of lightning. I wouldn't have anything but fiber running
> between buildings.
>
> Media converters should run about $300 for both ends, 6 pair fiber is

about
> $1 a foot, 1 meter fiber patch cables about $70 for 2. You'll want 2 wall
> cabinets, $100 to $150 each. They get a lot of money to terminate the

ends,
> $35 seems to stick in my head, so $280 for a pair & a spare. Altogether
> $1,000 or so for hardware, not including running the cable.
>
> If you can't dig can you run an overhead cable? Hope I haven't added to

the
> confusion.
>
> Cleve
>
> "TheSingingCat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:40d058ee$1_2@news....
> > Personally, I would not be keen on running wireless... but maybe that's

> just
> > me, I like cables
> >
> > If the building is only 15m apart, I would call the city out and have

them
> > do an analysis on the ground for exisiting wires, water lines etc...
> > They'll paint all obstacles. Then have a little bobcat come out and

just
> > trench a foot down or so from building to building. This 'access' road,

> is
> > it paved? If so, you may have to forget my bobcat idea Anyhow, if

you
> > an lay it down, I'd run conduit in the trench and and wire the offices
> > directly.
> >
> > Failing that, search for wireless solutions Good luck though, this

> sort
> > of stuff is actually pretty fun coming up with solutions.
> >
> >
> > "TheScullster" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > Not sure that this is the best group, but hopefully someone will have
> > > experience.
> > >
> > > My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building

> and
> > > I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
> > > Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some

members
> > of
> > > staff will be moving to the new location.
> > > The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and

> > footpaths
> > > separating them.
> > > It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
> > > additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.
> > > What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx

cost?
> > >
> > > Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
> > > How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
> > > 100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?
> > > Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Alun Jones [MS]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 04:36 PM
"TheSingingCat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:40d058ee$1_2@news....
> If the building is only 15m apart, I would call the city out and have them
> do an analysis on the ground for exisiting wires, water lines etc...
> They'll paint all obstacles. Then have a little bobcat come out and just
> trench a foot down or so from building to building. This 'access' road,

is
> it paved? If so, you may have to forget my bobcat idea Anyhow, if you
> an lay it down, I'd run conduit in the trench and and wire the offices
> directly.


Of course, you would also want to make sure that you are able to cope with
the likelihood that the two buildings are "earthed" at different potentials!

Many a hobbyist has fried a modem board by connecting to a computer at their
neighbours' house. I think I vaguely remember that ethernet boards may have
similar problems. Perhaps that's an argument for optical fibre - after all,
there's not usually a difference between "dark" :-)

Alun.
~~~~


 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Cochran
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 05:49 PM
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:22:23 +0100, "TheScullster"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building and
>I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
>Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some members of
>staff will be moving to the new location.
>The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and footpaths
>separating them.
>It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
>additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.
>What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx cost?


Most relaible? Fiber, specifically Single Mode, and cost depends on a
whiole bunch of factors so you'll need to get a local quote.

>Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
>How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
>100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?


Suitable in that it runs slower, is possibly les secure and may not
pass the distance required?

>Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!


Might look at Firetide's new mesh routers, we've been getting
estimates of about $800 per location and you're well within the
requirements. At firetide.com of course...

Jeff
 
Reply With Quote
 
Roland Hall
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 06:11 PM
"Jeff Cochran" wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
: On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:22:23 +0100, "TheScullster"
: <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
:
: >My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building and
: >I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
: >Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some members
of
: >staff will be moving to the new location.
: >The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and
footpaths
: >separating them.
: >It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
: >additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.

Not enough information to determine that.

: >What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx cost?
:
: Most relaible? Fiber, specifically Single Mode, and cost depends on a
: whiole bunch of factors so you'll need to get a local quote.

He said 15 meters, not 15 miles, unless I'm reading that wrong. 62.5/125
micron dual mode fiber is what this calls for if fiber is used, however, I
see no reason not to consider using wireless.

: >Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
: >How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
: >100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?
:
: Suitable in that it runs slower, is possibly les secure and may not
: pass the distance required?

CAT5 can be sniffed off air and without WEP how would it be more secure?

: >Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!
:
: Might look at Firetide's new mesh routers, we've been getting
: estimates of about $800 per location and you're well within the
: requirements. At firetide.com of course...


--
Roland Hall
/* This information is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
without any warranty; without even the implied warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose. */
Online Support for IT Professionals -
http://support.microsoft.com/service...p?fr=0&sd=tech
How-to: Windows 2000 DNS:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;308201
FAQ W2K/2K3 DNS:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;291382


 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Cochran
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-16-2004, 08:07 PM
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:11:12 -0500, "Roland Hall" <nobody@nowhere>
wrote:

>"Jeff Cochran" wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>: On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:22:23 +0100, "TheScullster"
>: <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>:
>: >My company is looking to take a lease on an adjacent offfice building and
>: >I'm interested in the group's opinion on communication options.
>: >Basically the company has outgrown the current premises, so some members
>of
>: >staff will be moving to the new location.
>: >The buildings are approx 15m apart with an estate access road and
>footpaths
>: >separating them.
>: >It makes sense to me to try to extend the network rather than install
>: >additional servers, software, backup hardware etc.
>
>Not enough information to determine that.
>
>: >What is the most reliable way of linking the buildings and approx cost?
>:
>: Most relaible? Fiber, specifically Single Mode, and cost depends on a
>: whiole bunch of factors so you'll need to get a local quote.
>
>He said 15 meters, not 15 miles, unless I'm reading that wrong. 62.5/125
>micron dual mode fiber is what this calls for if fiber is used, however, I
>see no reason not to consider using wireless.


Crap Wish I had learned to read...

Make it multi-mode for the fiber.

Jeff

>: >Also, the existing building apparently uses wireless networking.
>: >How reliable is this and is this a suitably stable alternative to the
>: >100Mbps cat5 cabled version in our current office?
>:
>: Suitable in that it runs slower, is possibly les secure and may not
>: pass the distance required?
>
>CAT5 can be sniffed off air and without WEP how would it be more secure?
>
>: >Any links to wireless networking for newbies gratefully received!
>:
>: Might look at Firetide's new mesh routers, we've been getting
>: estimates of about $800 per location and you're well within the
>: requirements. At firetide.com of course...


 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-17-2004, 01:54 PM

"Jeff Cochran" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >He said 15 meters, not 15 miles, unless I'm reading that wrong. 62.5/125
> >micron dual mode fiber is what this calls for if fiber is used, however,

I
> >see no reason not to consider using wireless.

>
> Crap Wish I had learned to read...
>
> Make it multi-mode for the fiber.


Don't worry about it. We have fiber in a similar stituation here and I
couldn't even remember what type it was and the wall-box is only 8 feet away
from me.

--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Networking 2 buildings UPNDOWN Network Routers 5 03-28-2006 11:54 PM
LAN between two buildings Chris Laird Home Networking 20 02-03-2005 11:34 PM
LAN between two buildings Chris Laird Home Networking 3 01-27-2005 07:49 PM
cat5e between two buildings. MarkR Home Networking 19 02-28-2004 08:14 AM
options for wireless networking between 2 buildings Julian Fowler Home Networking 2 10-23-2003 02:04 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11