Netstat -r in Linux Vs FreeBSD

netstat -r gives different output in FreeBSD vs Linux. It is more verbose
in FreeBSD, and shows routes to all nodes on a network. Is there a way to
make Linux more verbose? I have tried -v and -e.

BSD $ netstat -r
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.1.1 UGSc 1 0 dc0
localhost localhost UH 1 0 lo0
192.168.1 link#1 UC 3 0 dc0
192.168.1.1 00:06:25:63:dd:ec UHLW 2 0 dc0 1190
surf 00:a0:cc:28:8c:7a UHLW 1 117 dc0 1135
smurf localhost UGHS 0 0 lo0
192.168.1.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 3 65 dc0


Linux :~> netstat -r
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0

Buck Turgidson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> netstat -r gives different output in FreeBSD vs Linux. It is more verbose
> in FreeBSD, and shows routes to all nodes on a network. Is there a way to
> make Linux more verbose? I have tried -v and -e.

Hello,
Experiment around with the many options of netstat and you'll get a variety of
info.
A few of my favorite option combos:
netstat -plant
netstat -punta
netstat -at
There's more. Hate to say it, but...'man netstat'

David

"Buck Turgidson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) s.com

> netstat -r gives different output in FreeBSD vs Linux. It is more
> verbose in FreeBSD, and shows routes to all nodes on a network. Is
> there a way to make Linux more verbose? I have tried -v and -e.

The man page for any given command is a useful reference when working in
multiple OSs.

The "-a" option is what you want.


tony

--
use hotmail for any email replies



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----