simonbray wrote:
> "Larry Riffle" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:c1qc7c$1hk6$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>Did I stumble into the worst of a generally lousy support system or is
>>this part of a pattern?
>>
>>A simple error in the documentation stopped me from configuring one of
>>the basic features of a Netgear product. After weeks of ignored emails
>>and unreturned phone calls I was told this didn't come under the "basic
>>free support". As soon as I let them charge $28.95 to my credit card for
>>"premium" service they gave me the right information which amounted to a
>>once sentence correction.
>>
>>Anybody else had a similar experience? I do have a lot of Netgear
>>hardware and, though the "free" warranty support consistently stinks,
>>this is the first time they've made me buy a feature I'd already paid
>>for once.
>>
>>Did you see that shadow on the grassy-knoll?
>>
>>I'll post the answer separately in case somebody else is about to spend
>>$28.95.
>
> I don't know about laws regarding sales in your country, but in the UK, this
> would be covered under the Sale of Goods Act and the Trades Descriptions Act
> which would have made the item not fit for the purpose for which it was
> intended. These two laws would probably stop Netgear charging for what is
> obviously a printing error in their documentation. You wouldn't expect to
> buy a car from a showroom, then have to pay for the key to make it work.
I could have returned it for a refund but I chose to fight it out. Its
one of several pieces of netgear hardware in this project and perfectly
suited the purpose, now that I can configure it.
I'm a big fan of their products but not of the company.
>
> Write a letter to the Managing Director or CEO of Netgear explaining your
> situation. They may have the common decency to refund you.
>
> S
Actually I sent it to the president of netgear but I'm not holding my
breath.
>
>
|