In article <a1940098-d74d-4364-9aa8-(E-Mail Removed)>,
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>hi
>
>I've been a happy ntl/Virgin customer for several years - great,
>reliable broadband connection.
>
>However, I need to move & my new house doesn't have cable
>(although it is right on the edge of a suburb that does).
>
>As I understand it, there are inevitable bandwidth sharing issues with
>ADSL which means the connection is not as consistent (in bandwidth
>terms) as cable.
I think you'll find that there are bandwidth sharing (or contention)
with cable too. they're just not as up-front about it as the ADSL
sellers are.
>Can anyone recommend me an ADSL ISP / package which would come nearest
>to replicating the 4MB service I have with Virgin ?
How much do you want to pay?
Then pick 2 of these 3: Low-cost, fast, reliable. You can only have 2.
Any 2, but never all 3.
>Do all providers use BT infrastructure ? If so, do they all provide
>similar quality of connection or are some more reliable than others ?
Some providers have their own equipment in the BT exchanges. There are
typically called LLU suppliers (LLU is Local Loop Unbundled).
On the BT front, you have a choice of over 100 ISPs who use the BT
Wholesale system. BT is just one ISP out of these 100+ who use the BT
wholesale system.
>Given the close proximity to a cabled area, is there a way I can check
>whether Virgin plan to connect this street or do they never divulge
>this information ?
I'd suggest that the chances of any telco digging up the streets to lay
new cable, fibre, copper right now is slim to zero...
You might want to check the pages on:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/
To get a better view of things. Good ISPs IMO are Zen, and any of the
Entanet resellers, and maybe some of the smaller ones with a UK call
centre.
You get what you pay for.
Gordon