Sorry for the other blank reply.... my mouse got away from me..
Forget the two-network idea unless you or them are well aquainted with a
"Back-to-Back DMZ" concept and all the pros-cons, ups-downs, of dealing with
them.
If you want to use ISA, then be sure that the hardware you get for the
Internet connection is a simple device that has *no* IP# and does *not* do
NAT,...otherwise you are back to that "Back-to-Back DMZ" issue again. Also
avoid PPPoE like the plague.
I see no point in DHCP, but if you use it,..do it on your own Server, but it
has no effect on the Internet in any way. Personally I don't see any point
in saying that the users *need* to use DHCP,....DHCP is a "want-to" or a
"would-like-to", it is never realy a "have-to".
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
"Dezere" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

C62064F-A5F4-47DE-8572-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi there,
> I'm helping a relative set up a network for his new business which will be
a
> real estate office. He would also like to control a little access to the
web.
> I was thinking of setting up with two networks, an external and an
internal,
> with one domain controller and an ISA server on the web side and another
> domain controller and the rest of the pc's on the private side (and of
course
> the ISA server). The only thing I'm thinking is this way may not be the
most
> cost effective since he'll have to buy 3 more computers and all the
software
> for three computers. Also, people will need to use DHCP and can't have
fixed
> IP's. There will probably be at most 10 people accessing the web at the
same
> time. Does anyone have any other suggestions on a network setup? I'm also
> fine with going with Windows 2000 Server if there is any way to save money
> going that route. Thanks so much in advance!
>
> Dezere'