"RobR" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:c5aCf.3556$ie3.1581@trndny09...
>
> "snertking" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> RobR wrote:
>>> I have a comcast business block of IP addresses, here is what
>>> comcast provided:
>>>
>>> 70.88.100.104 is my network
>>> .105 - 109 are usable
>>> .110 is gateway
>>> .111 is broadcast
>>> mask is 255.255.255.248
>>>
>>> i need to break this into two subnets,
>>> so i set the mask to 255.255.255.252
>>> which gives me
>>> .104 network
>>> .105, .106 usable
>>> .107 broadcast
>>>
>>> .108 network
>>> .109, .110 usable
>>> .111 broadcast
>>>
>>> the question i have is what happens to the gateway? i cant
>>> use .110 for both networks. im really not sure what
>>> to do in this case.
>>>
>>> (the reason for this is my router requires that if i
>>> want to put a box on the DMZ it has to be in
>>> a different subnet than the rest of the network).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You can't do what you describe, unless your DMZ can be natted. And in
>> that case, you can have any network range you want for the DMZ.
>>
>> The problem is exactly what you wonder about - what happens to the
>> gateway. The outward (internet) facing interface on the firewall needs to
>> be on the same subnet as the ISP router at 70.88.100.110. Trying to
>> sbunet that will cause issues - incoming packets that may nee dto be
>> routed by the firewall will appear local to the ISP gateway, etc.
>>
>> What type of firewall is this? Most do support NAT for the DMZ.
>
> it's a zyxel zywall 35 which does support NAT to the DMZ
> but the problem is that the box I want on the DMZ is running
> Asterisk VOIP PBX which apparently can't sit behind a NAT.
> would this work if i just ran the cable modem to a hub and
> plugged both the router and the Asterisk server into the
> hub?
>
the switch did the trick. asterisk is up and running and
hanging out on the net with no firewall in all it's glory

.