"john" <john,(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:4786cf2c$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:L-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Or to be more precise, buying one.
>>
>> I posted three or four weeks ago saying that my Linksys WAG54GS had died
>> on the wireless side and I was asking for suggestions for a replacement.
>> I need QoS functionallity and, because I let my next-door neighbour
>> piggy-back on my account wirelessly, the wireless connection has to be
>> solid and reliable (only about 30m and one brick wall apart), because I
>> don't want the neighbour knocking on the door every two minutes saying
>> that their connection has dropped.
>>
>
> How stupid are you for letting a neighbour do that. Do you realise that
> legally you are responsible for anything they do on your connection? It's
> your IP number and subscriber details that will be traced. Your neighbour
> will deny all knowledge.
My next-door neighbours are rather decent people. He is 79-years old, she is
84 and are very light users, mainly just emails/Skype to relatives around
the world. I just didn't think it was worth all the hassle and expense of
them setting up their own account for such light use so I allow them to
piggy-back on mine. I have no worries whatsoever about their behaviour
online.
>> Unfortunately, the only suggestion at the time was a Netgear DG834GT -
>> but after downloading the spec. sheet from Netgear, I know that it
>> doesn't do QoS.
>>
>
> Well I have one and it does have QoS. Mine is the version 3.
I can only point you to the pdf spec sheet available here:
http://www.netgear.co.uk/pdfs/dg834gt.pdf
>> So I'm now hoping that there are some new people reading this and some
>> new suggestions will come forth 'cos I'm getting desperate now - limping
>> along on my old BT Voyager 2091 at the mo.
>>
>
> Why change it if it works
The clue is in the phrase "limping along on my old...." The old 2091 works,
but not very well, which is why I ditched it for the Linksys in the first
place. It's OK as a standby until I get something better, but that's about
it.
> If you just want one with QoS then I don't think you understand what it
> is. It's not the same as packet shaping or preference and it wouldn't
> work with two PCs at the same time. It will not split the connection
> between you to give equal use or anything. The only way to do that is
> have your neighbour hook up to your PC and run cfosspeed. That will ensure
> equal use and give priority to web browsing and email before P2P.
I need QoS to allocate dedicated bandwidth to my BT Vision service, and
possibly VoIP, if/when I decide to set them up - nothing whatsoever to do
with sharing my account with my neighbour. And I can assure you, I do know
what QoS is and what it does.
If you can't answer the question sensibly, (come to think of it, you haven't
answered the question *at all* unless I missed your suggestions for a
suitable replacement router) please don't reply at all.
John
John