> Client for Microsoft Networks or some other provider is a prerequisite for
> connection by UNC name. See:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...d_arc_hnny.asp
>
> You should not need NetBIOS, but you might have to connect by IP address -
> net use r: \\IPofServer\r$
>
> Doug Sherman
> MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>
Hi Doug
Thanks for you reply.
Earlier today I refreshed myself of the current Microsoft implementation
of TCP/IP networking & have solved most of the main issues I was
concerned about.
Direct Hosting of SMB over TCP/IP
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q204279
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 TCP/IP Implementation Details
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...2003/technolog
ies/networking/tcpip03.mspx
My earlier attempts at connecting to the remote share using Direct
Hosting (TCP 445) instead of NetBIOS resolution (TCP 139) were failing
as I had not added a forward/reverse lookup entry in DNS for the remote
host.
My attempts to net use r: \\xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx\r$ failed because there was
no reverse lookup entry for that ip address.
Have now been able to disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP throughout.
I've also created a new packet filter on ISA Server to explicitly allow
Direct Hosting (TCP 445) outbound only to the remote host/site.
My security preference would be to also be able to disable Client for
Microsoft Networks on the external NIC of the ISA Server.
Can anybody following this thread think of a way this could be achieved?
What is the real security threat of leaving Client for Microsoft
Networks enabled on the external NIC?
--
Kind Regards
Charles Mitchell
datalocate.net