From: "Doc Shenley" <(E-Mail Removed)>
| I'm in the process of converting from dial-up to cable and need some advice
| about a suitable router - or indeed whether I need one or not. I have two
| machines in the same room and the current status is that I can put either
| machine online by physically changing over the LAN cable. That is
| essentially the same arrangement I had with dial-up. There is no need to
| have both machines online at the same time, and I don't need to have the
| machines connected to each other.
|
| Basically, its a fag (and untidy) messing with the cable. Is there such a
| thing as a switchable 2-into-1 box? As you can see, I'm a bit clueless. If
| I do need a router, what would be the most basic model that would do what I
| want? Grateful for any help.
|
You should get a Router if not just for the added security it brings to the table.
I suggest the Linksys BEFSR41. While you may not currently share data between the two home
computers, hooking them up on the LAN side of the Router and allowing them to share the one
Internet address will also allow you to share data between computers if you want. That
would mean Machine A can print to the printer on Machine B or Machine B could access the
CDROM drive in Machine A, etc, etc.
As always, I suggest blocking both TCP and UDP ports 135 ~ 139 and 445 on *any* SOHO Router.
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm