Gordon wrote:
> Current setup - BT Home Highway ISDN. Wife uses dial-up VPN to her Company
> intranet and email (currently through Tiscali but has been Claranet and BT
> Click - depends on the IT dept!). I dial-in to an ISP of my own choice.
>
> Broadband coming in Dec this year. Presumably all we need is a router (I
> would like one that does wireless and cable connections as my laptop is
> wireless-enabled but hers is not) and the ADSL modem to connect to
> whichever BB supplier we decide on? As we are on Home Highway, is there
> any price advantage with going to BT Broadband (email and news can be
> independent of ISP as I know that the bog-standard BT BB doesn't have
> email or news), or is the BT BB service so dire that any other supplier is
> better?
Check out the other providers on
www.broadband-help.com the other site .org
is a paid for site and does not list the smaller and less costly providers.
You bought HH instead of ISDN and BT are the one's who priced ISDN out of
the market place, so why should you go with them for provision of your ip
services?
ISDN is a switched service with a contention ratio of 1 so be careful who
you choose advertising a ADSL service. They quote the maximum speed of the
service (usually 512Kbps) but the guaranteed speed is the maximum burst
speed divided by the contention ratio and if the contention ratio of 76
alleged by some users means that you get rates of 6.7Kbps. Even one channel
of ISDN guarantees you 64Kbps.
Remember, the more users they have on your exchange (assuming the bottleneck
is there) the more you will go down to the guaranteed speed.
I advocate ADSL annex B adsl over ISDN, so ask your BT, MP and MEP why you
are denied the services that other EU countries have had for years?
--
Lioncom adsl 4 port router, Nildram adsl running on Redhat 7.3. You can see
and hear me and my pal Joe Longthorne on uktalent.org.