to expand a bit more,
there are situations where the client actually is NOT aware of a proxy
server - regardless, the proxy knows when another client requests
something thats already in its cache, so it does not have to look for
it again, it just sends the cached data back to the client.....thus
saving network load/traffic
Bill Grant schrieb:
> To expand a bit, caching requires that the client be aware of the
> situation. With NAT, the client is not aware that it is behind a NAT. It
> behaves as if it has a direct connection and sends its requests to the
> "external" addresses. NAT translates the requests.
>
> With a proxy server, the client is aware of the proxy server. It sends
> its requests to the proxy server. The proxy server does the external queries
> on its behalf and caches the replies.
>
> Bill Grant wrote:
> > A proxy server would be a better idea for that sort of thing.
> >
> > Daniel wrote:
> >> Is it advisable to use windows NAT inside a network where there is a
> >> NAT router ? my purpose is try to cache all the queries before it
> >> reaches my hardware router and to reduce my network traffic. Pls
> >> advise thanks.
> >>
> >> Rgds
> >> Daniel
|