Multihomed Windows 2003 DC server - prevent DNS registration of one network card

Or you just don't get IT....ever thought about that? Proboboly not since you
are always right...and why bather to to do what somewone else wants when you
can do what you want instead.....who cares if it is helpfull to the other
guy or not...as long as I have my freedom to do what I want the other guy
have to stand down...he is wrong anyway...and probobly a looser, so who
cares?


Now I am tired of your narrow minded world, your eager to do things "your
way" and your lack of empathy for others. You are obviously one of the
religious fanatics with no care for anyone but your self and only want to
impose your world on others.

/H



"Phillip Windell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Håkan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Obviously you are both americans,
>
> Actually I am English/Irish/French, and she, If I'm not mistaken, she is
> French. We just live in America.
>
>> which explains your lack of logic in realising that when somewone asks
>> Question A they don't want answer to Question B.
>
> ....resulting in us being more technologically advanced than a large part
> of the world over the years. We know a bad idea when we see it and look
> for a better way.
>
>> Or that the their realty is wrong and they should start using your
>> reality instead. I hope you didn't use the same strategy in the war, it
>> would lead to a dissaster...ops, you did...and now the whole world hates
>> you.....strange...isn't it?
>
> A war that we won in record time. The war itself is over.
> It's those in the aftermath (who aren't Americans BTW) that don't have
> enough brains to stop shooting each other and everyone else around them
> that keeps the problems going.
> If they stopped,...we'd leave. Then they could run the place however they
> want.
> I guess you could always shoot that extra Nic with a AK47 and it would
> probably stop registering in DNS.
>
> Those that hate us do so because their governments and their "religious"
> leaders tell them to hate us and fill thier minds with propaganda. The
> rest hate us because we are more successful as a country and people want
> to hate everyone who is more successful than they are themselves,...it's
> called Class Envy and jealousy, and it grows like weeds everywhere you
> water it.
>
> --
> Phillip Windell
> www.wandtv.com
>
> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or
> Microsoft, or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>

"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<(E-Mail Removed) hoo.com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Håkan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> Obviously you are both americans, which explains your lack of logic in
>> realising that when somewone asks Question A they don't want answer to
>> Question B. Or that the their realty is wrong and they should start
>> using your reality instead. I hope you didn't use the same strategy
>> in the war, it would lead to a dissaster...ops, you did...and now the
>> whole world hates you.....strange...isn't it?
>>
>> /H
>>
> Why, how terribly charming and diplomatic of you to make wild, random
> assumptions
> such as that about my politics, not to mention my grasp of logic and
> technology.
>
> <plonk>
>
>
>

Hakan, I can assure you that I am an Australian of Irish/Scottish descent
and would give you much the same advice. If you persist with using an
unsupported configuration and don't supply any details of your setup, you
are on your own.

KB292822 will give you an outline of the sorts of problems multihomed
DCs present. It refers to problems with remote access but the problems are
much the same no matter how the multihoming comes about. The basic problem
is the fact that the machine name is associated with more than one IP
address, whether that name is a DNS or Netbios name.

I know this, it has been there same problem since windows NT 3.5.

But my question is not regarding this. It is about stopping a network card
from registering it's IP addresses with the DNS server. I don't have any
problems with anything else. If I can get the network card to stop
registrating it's address I have no problems at all. The fact that I
uncheck the register checkbox and the nic still registers it's addresses is
my problem, nothing else.

/H

"Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
> <(E-Mail Removed) hoo.com> wrote in
> message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Håkan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> Obviously you are both americans, which explains your lack of logic in
>>> realising that when somewone asks Question A they don't want answer to
>>> Question B. Or that the their realty is wrong and they should start
>>> using your reality instead. I hope you didn't use the same strategy
>>> in the war, it would lead to a dissaster...ops, you did...and now the
>>> whole world hates you.....strange...isn't it?
>>>
>>> /H
>>>
>> Why, how terribly charming and diplomatic of you to make wild, random
>> assumptions
>> such as that about my politics, not to mention my grasp of logic and
>> technology.
>>
>> <plonk>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Hakan, I can assure you that I am an Australian of Irish/Scottish
> descent and would give you much the same advice. If you persist with using
> an unsupported configuration and don't supply any details of your setup,
> you are on your own.
>
> KB292822 will give you an outline of the sorts of problems multihomed
> DCs present. It refers to problems with remote access but the problems are
> much the same no matter how the multihoming comes about. The basic problem
> is the fact that the machine name is associated with more than one IP
> address, whether that name is a DNS or Netbios name.
>

It may not be the card at all. DHCP can do it,or some other machine can
act as a proxy.

"Håkan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I know this, it has been there same problem since windows NT 3.5.
>
> But my question is not regarding this. It is about stopping a network card
> from registering it's IP addresses with the DNS server. I don't have any
> problems with anything else. If I can get the network card to stop
> registrating it's address I have no problems at all. The fact that I
> uncheck the register checkbox and the nic still registers it's addresses
> is my problem, nothing else.
>
> /H
>
> "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
>> <(E-Mail Removed) hoo.com> wrote in
>> message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Håkan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>> Obviously you are both americans, which explains your lack of logic in
>>>> realising that when somewone asks Question A they don't want answer to
>>>> Question B. Or that the their realty is wrong and they should start
>>>> using your reality instead. I hope you didn't use the same strategy
>>>> in the war, it would lead to a dissaster...ops, you did...and now the
>>>> whole world hates you.....strange...isn't it?
>>>>
>>>> /H
>>>>
>>> Why, how terribly charming and diplomatic of you to make wild, random
>>> assumptions
>>> such as that about my politics, not to mention my grasp of logic and
>>> technology.
>>>
>>> <plonk>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hakan, I can assure you that I am an Australian of Irish/Scottish
>> descent and would give you much the same advice. If you persist with
>> using an unsupported configuration and don't supply any details of your
>> setup, you are on your own.
>>
>> KB292822 will give you an outline of the sorts of problems multihomed
>> DCs present. It refers to problems with remote access but the problems
>> are much the same no matter how the multihoming comes about. The basic
>> problem is the fact that the machine name is associated with more than
>> one IP address, whether that name is a DNS or Netbios name.
>>
>
>

Microsft has already confirmed this to be a problem in Windows 2003 which is
suposed to be soleved in SP1...still i get the problem. The reason it gets
into the DNS is most likely because Netlogon puts it the.

Anyway this is obviously a matter to complicated for the newsgroup to
handel.

/H


"Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
news:O9ck7Z%(E-Mail Removed)...
> It may not be the card at all. DHCP can do it,or some other machine can
> act as a proxy.
>
> "Håkan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I know this, it has been there same problem since windows NT 3.5.
>>
>> But my question is not regarding this. It is about stopping a network
>> card from registering it's IP addresses with the DNS server. I don't have
>> any problems with anything else. If I can get the network card to stop
>> registrating it's address I have no problems at all. The fact that I
>> uncheck the register checkbox and the nic still registers it's addresses
>> is my problem, nothing else.
>>
>> /H
>>
>> "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>
>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
>>> <(E-Mail Removed) hoo.com> wrote in
>>> message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Håkan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>> Obviously you are both americans, which explains your lack of logic in
>>>>> realising that when somewone asks Question A they don't want answer to
>>>>> Question B. Or that the their realty is wrong and they should start
>>>>> using your reality instead. I hope you didn't use the same strategy
>>>>> in the war, it would lead to a dissaster...ops, you did...and now the
>>>>> whole world hates you.....strange...isn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>> /H
>>>>>
>>>> Why, how terribly charming and diplomatic of you to make wild, random
>>>> assumptions
>>>> such as that about my politics, not to mention my grasp of logic and
>>>> technology.
>>>>
>>>> <plonk>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hakan, I can assure you that I am an Australian of Irish/Scottish
>>> descent and would give you much the same advice. If you persist with
>>> using an unsupported configuration and don't supply any details of your
>>> setup, you are on your own.
>>>
>>> KB292822 will give you an outline of the sorts of problems multihomed
>>> DCs present. It refers to problems with remote access but the problems
>>> are much the same no matter how the multihoming comes about. The basic
>>> problem is the fact that the machine name is associated with more than
>>> one IP address, whether that name is a DNS or Netbios name.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Håkan,

Try this on the second interface that you do not want register it’s IP
in DNS
1. Uncheck Register this connection's Address in DNS
2. Disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP

This should stop the second interface from registering in your DNS.

Cheers,

Cody


--
heapteach
------------------------------------------------------------------------
heapteach's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=34891
View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=833887

http://forums.techarena.in

Found a solution at the following link:

The third paragraph down from Jason Tann -

http://www.egghead/forumarchives/Win...st26096008.asp

Hope this does it for you.


--
trucker
------------------------------------------------------------------------
trucker's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=50672
View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=833887

http://forums.techarena.in

Are you using DHCP to obtain the address? If that is the case, DHCP wil
register it for you

--
denny
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
dennyd's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=5049
View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=83388

http://forums.techarena.i

you want to go to the DNS manager, right click on the server, properties and select "listen on" "only the following Ip addresses". Delete the ones you don't want

> On Monday, October 15, 2007 3:29 AM H?kan wrote:

> I have a multi-homed 2003 Server running as a Domain Controller. I want the
> IP address on one of the network cards not to register it self with the DNS
> server. I have unchecked the "register this connection's addresses in DNS"
> check box on the DNS tab for the IP configuration for this network card.
> Still the IP address keep showing up in the DNS server.
>
> I have tried to delete the record manually with no success as the address
> reappears at next reboot.
>
> Anyone has any clue what makes the server register the address even though I
> told it not to?
>
>
> /H?kan


>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 10:27 AM Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:

>> H?kan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> Note that this is rarely a good idea and can cause all kinds of problems
>> with DNS, and other things. Depending on your reasons for using this config,
>> you may be better off with a router or VLAN configuration.
>>
>>
>> Try posting an *unedited* ipconfig /all from this server.


>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 11:34 AM H?kan wrote:

>>> Why is this rarely a good idea? Microsoft even made a compleate product
>>> around the concept of a DC with two network cards (Small Business Server)??
>>>
>>> Anyway, I want help with the question I have....I don't want and
>>> recomendations on a solution or anything like that. Because if I can't get
>>> the network card not to registrate it self with the DNS I will have to
>>> figure out a compleatly different solution...like uninstalling the domain
>>> and running without a domain.
>>>
>>>
>>> So the question again:
>>> How do i prevent the DC from rerigtrating one of the network cards IP
>>> Address with the DNS server?
>>> (I have unchecked the "register this connection's addresses in DNS" check
>>> box on the DNS tab for the IP configuration for this network card. Still the
>>> IP address keep showing up in the DNS server.)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> C:\>ipconfig /all
>>>
>>> Windows IP Configuration
>>>
>>> Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : pripps
>>> Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Snurre.local
>>> Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown
>>> IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>>> WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>>> DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : Snurre.local
>>>
>>>
>>> Ethernet adapter VMware Network Adapter VMnet1:
>>>
>>> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
>>> Description . . . . . . . . . . . : VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for
>>> VMnet1
>>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-C0-00-01
>>> DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.11.101
>>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
>>>
>>>
>>> Ethernet adapter Internet:
>>>
>>> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
>>> Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom BCM5708C NetXtreme II GigE
>>> (NDIS VBD Client)
>>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1D-09-01-75-EE
>>> DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 194.238.76.244
>>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.240
>>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 194.238.76.241
>>>
>>>
>>> Ethernet adapter Snurre.local:
>>>
>>> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
>>> Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom BCM5708C NetXtreme II GigE
>>> (NDIS VBD Client) #2
>>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1D-09-01-75-F0
>>> DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
>>> Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
>>> Autoconfiguration IP Address. . . : 169.254.54.204
>>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
>>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> /H?kan
>>>
>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
>>> <(E-Mail Removed) hoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...


>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 1:10 PM Phillip Windell wrote:

>>>> "H?kan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>
>>>> That is SBS, not yours. MS designed SBS to be that way,...regular DCs are
>>>> not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you are saying, "Don't tell me the truth",...and "Don't give me the
>>>> correct advice"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So instead of doing it the correct way,...you just eliminate the Domain?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In addition to unchecking the "register this connection's addresses in DNS",
>>>> you also need to make sure that the TCP/IP Specs of that particular Nic have
>>>> a Blank DNS entry. The other Nic should have the DNS entry.
>>>>
>>>> Then delete the rouge entry from.
>>>>
>>>> The Broadcom BCM5708C is set to use DHCP, but there is no DHCP Server
>>>> providing an address for it, hence the 169.254.*.* address. Leave the nic
>>>> unpluged and disabled.


>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 1:43 PM H?kan wrote:

>>>>> The whole concept of these newsgroups are to help other users...by answering
>>>>> their questions. I think it is a bit arrogant to tell the people they ask
>>>>> the wrong question, especially when you don't have all the info on the
>>>>> subect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Youy say: ""Don't tell me the truth",...and "Don't give me the correct
>>>>> advice"?" with that statement you are implying that I have the wrong
>>>>> solution...which you impossibly could know, since you know only a small
>>>>> portion of the parameters that i have to take into account when designing
>>>>> the network.
>>>>>
>>>>> My suggestion to you is to not answer any more questions unless you really
>>>>> want to help the user asking the question.
>>>>>
>>>>> /H?kan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Phillip Windell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>>> news:%23$(E-Mail Removed)...


>>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 2:23 PM Phillip Windell wrote:

>>>>>> "H?kan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did give you advice if you would have continued to read the rest of the
>>>>>> post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is also arrogant to think that your question could not be wrong in its
>>>>>> premise and that you could not possibly be following a bad design from the
>>>>>> beginnning which would be the "root" cause of your problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is also arrogant to complain that someone doesn't have all the
>>>>>> information about your network, when you are the one that was supposed to
>>>>>> give the relevant information to them so their analysis could be more
>>>>>> accurate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, yes, your post made me mad, which was obvious.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------


>>>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 4:47 PM Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:

>>>>>>> H?kan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SBS is its own beast. Even in SBS, it's a bad configuration. I don't use two
>>>>>>> NICs in any of my SBS installs. That said, as Phil Windell pointed out, you
>>>>>>> are not *using* SBS, so this is irrelevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, if you will read my reply to you very carefully, you will see that in
>>>>>>> addition to my *politely* suggesting that this is a bad configuration, I
>>>>>>> *also* asked you a valid question about your ipconfig details ....this
>>>>>>> should have made it clear I intended to try and help you with your specific
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At this point, I must say that the tone of your reply to me, as well as that
>>>>>>> of your replies to Phil, makes me uninclined to continue trying to help you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this is the case, perhaps you shouldn't ask for free tech support from
>>>>>>> complete strangers who are kindly volunteering their time to help others in
>>>>>>> a public newsgroup....caveat emptor. You can call Microsoft product support
>>>>>>> services and they will give you dedicated one-on-one support for a flat
>>>>>>> rate...currently $135/USD, I believe.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, that may take care of the symptom, but then, so would disconnecting
>>>>>>> the power supply. It's a bit drastic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good luck out there.


>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 5:26 PM H?kan wrote:

>>>>>>>> Obviously you are both americans, which explains your lack of logic in
>>>>>>>> realising that when somewone asks Question A they don't want answer to
>>>>>>>> Question B. Or that the their realty is wrong and they should start using
>>>>>>>> your reality instead. I hope you didn't use the same strategy in the war,
>>>>>>>> it would lead to a dissaster...ops, you did...and now the whole world hates
>>>>>>>> you.....strange...isn't it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /H
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
>>>>>>>> <(E-Mail Removed) hoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...


>>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 5:55 PM Phillip Windell wrote:

>>>>>>>>> "H?kan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually I am English/Irish/French, and she, If I'm not mistaken, she is
>>>>>>>>> French. We just live in America.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ....resulting in us being more technologically advanced than a large part of
>>>>>>>>> the world over the years. We know a bad idea when we see it and look for a
>>>>>>>>> better way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A war that we won in record time. The war itself is over.
>>>>>>>>> It's those in the aftermath (who aren't Americans BTW) that don't have
>>>>>>>>> enough brains to stop shooting each other and everyone else around them that
>>>>>>>>> keeps the problems going.
>>>>>>>>> If they stopped,...we'd leave. Then they could run the place however they
>>>>>>>>> want.
>>>>>>>>> I guess you could always shoot that extra Nic with a AK47 and it would
>>>>>>>>> probably stop registering in DNS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Those that hate us do so because their governments and their "religious"
>>>>>>>>> leaders tell them to hate us and fill thier minds with propaganda. The rest
>>>>>>>>> hate us because we are more successful as a country and people want to hate
>>>>>>>>> everyone who is more successful than they are themselves,...it's called
>>>>>>>>> Class Envy and jealousy, and it grows like weeds everywhere you water it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>>>>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>>>>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------


>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 6:18 PM Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Why, how terribly charming and diplomatic of you to make wild, random
>>>>>>>>>> assumptions
>>>>>>>>>> such as that about my politics, not to mention my grasp of logic and
>>>>>>>>>> technology.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <plonk>


>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 6:19 PM H?kan wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Or you just don't get IT....ever thought about that? Proboboly not since you
>>>>>>>>>>> are always right...and why bather to to do what somewone else wants when you
>>>>>>>>>>> can do what you want instead.....who cares if it is helpfull to the other
>>>>>>>>>>> guy or not...as long as I have my freedom to do what I want the other guy
>>>>>>>>>>> have to stand down...he is wrong anyway...and probobly a looser, so who
>>>>>>>>>>> cares?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now I am tired of your narrow minded world, your eager to do things "your
>>>>>>>>>>> way" and your lack of empathy for others. You are obviously one of the
>>>>>>>>>>> religious fanatics with no care for anyone but your self and only want to
>>>>>>>>>>> impose your world on others.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /H
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Phillip Windell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...


>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 15, 2007 7:25 PM Bill Grant wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <(E-Mail Removed) hoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hakan, I can assure you that I am an Australian of Irish/Scottish descent
>>>>>>>>>>>> and would give you much the same advice. If you persist with using an
>>>>>>>>>>>> unsupported configuration and don't supply any details of your setup, you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are on your own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KB292822 will give you an outline of the sorts of problems multihomed
>>>>>>>>>>>> DCs present. It refers to problems with remote access but the problems are
>>>>>>>>>>>> much the same no matter how the multihoming comes about. The basic problem
>>>>>>>>>>>> is the fact that the machine name is associated with more than one IP
>>>>>>>>>>>> address, whether that name is a DNS or Netbios name.


>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:10 AM H?kan wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this, it has been there same problem since windows NT 3.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But my question is not regarding this. It is about stopping a network card
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from registering it's IP addresses with the DNS server. I don't have any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems with anything else. If I can get the network card to stop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> registrating it's address I have no problems at all. The fact that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uncheck the register checkbox and the nic still registers it's addresses is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my problem, nothing else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...


>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 7:19 AM Bill Grant wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be the card at all. DHCP can do it,or some other machine can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> act as a proxy.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:21 PM H?kan wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsft has already confirmed this to be a problem in Windows 2003 which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suposed to be soleved in SP1...still i get the problem. The reason it gets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the DNS is most likely because Netlogon puts it the.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway this is obviously a matter to complicated for the newsgroup to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> handel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:O9ck7Z%(E-Mail Removed)...


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, November 12, 2007 5:17 PM heapteach wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H?kan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try this on the second interface that you do not want register it?s IP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in DNS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Uncheck Register this connection's Address in DNS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This should stop the second interface from registering in your DNS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cody
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heapteach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heapteach's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=34891
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=833887
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Submitted via EggHeadCafe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft Silverlight For Beginners
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/training-...lverlight.aspx