Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > multi-homed

Reply
 
 
lph
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-06-2004, 10:49 PM
Have set up a new 2003 server with one nic. Have assigned it
two IP addresses, one is say 192.168.1.40 and the other is
192.168.1.42. The AD is running in prewindows 2000 mode.

From another desktop it can mount a share using the IP
address, i.e. \\192.168.1.42\d$, but if one tries to use
say \\apple\d$ than you get the following:

You were not connected because a duplicate name exists on
the network. Go to System in Control Panel to change the
computer name and try again.

Tryed using the FQDN with the same result. Tryed using an
lmhost entry with the same result. Any help would be
appreciated. Thank You. LPH!
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Doug Sherman [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-06-2004, 11:51 PM
You need to change one of these IP addresses. You should not have 2 NICs on
the same subnet in a multihomed machine. If the machine is a domain
controller, your problems will escalate rapidly.

Doug Sherman
MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP

"lph" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2849101c463ab$91205830$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Have set up a new 2003 server with one nic. Have assigned it
> two IP addresses, one is say 192.168.1.40 and the other is
> 192.168.1.42. The AD is running in prewindows 2000 mode.
>
> From another desktop it can mount a share using the IP
> address, i.e. \\192.168.1.42\d$, but if one tries to use
> say \\apple\d$ than you get the following:
>
> You were not connected because a duplicate name exists on
> the network. Go to System in Control Panel to change the
> computer name and try again.
>
> Tryed using the FQDN with the same result. Tryed using an
> lmhost entry with the same result. Any help would be
> appreciated. Thank You. LPH!



 
Reply With Quote
 
Doug Sherman [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-07-2004, 12:12 AM
Sorry, I now see that you said one NIC. This article outlines some of the
considerations when assigning multiple IP addresses to a single adapter.

Doug Sherman
MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP

"Doug Sherman [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> You need to change one of these IP addresses. You should not have 2 NICs

on
> the same subnet in a multihomed machine. If the machine is a domain
> controller, your problems will escalate rapidly.
>
> Doug Sherman
> MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>
> "lph" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:2849101c463ab$91205830$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Have set up a new 2003 server with one nic. Have assigned it
> > two IP addresses, one is say 192.168.1.40 and the other is
> > 192.168.1.42. The AD is running in prewindows 2000 mode.
> >
> > From another desktop it can mount a share using the IP
> > address, i.e. \\192.168.1.42\d$, but if one tries to use
> > say \\apple\d$ than you get the following:
> >
> > You were not connected because a duplicate name exists on
> > the network. Go to System in Control Panel to change the
> > computer name and try again.
> >
> > Tryed using the FQDN with the same result. Tryed using an
> > lmhost entry with the same result. Any help would be
> > appreciated. Thank You. LPH!

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Doug Sherman [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-07-2004, 12:18 AM
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...c_tcp_qpzj.asp

Doug Sherman
MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP

"Doug Sherman [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sorry, I now see that you said one NIC. This article outlines some of the
> considerations when assigning multiple IP addresses to a single adapter.
>
> Doug Sherman
> MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>
> "Doug Sherman [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > You need to change one of these IP addresses. You should not have 2

NICs
> on
> > the same subnet in a multihomed machine. If the machine is a domain
> > controller, your problems will escalate rapidly.
> >
> > Doug Sherman
> > MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
> >
> > "lph" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:2849101c463ab$91205830$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Have set up a new 2003 server with one nic. Have assigned it
> > > two IP addresses, one is say 192.168.1.40 and the other is
> > > 192.168.1.42. The AD is running in prewindows 2000 mode.
> > >
> > > From another desktop it can mount a share using the IP
> > > address, i.e. \\192.168.1.42\d$, but if one tries to use
> > > say \\apple\d$ than you get the following:
> > >
> > > You were not connected because a duplicate name exists on
> > > the network. Go to System in Control Panel to change the
> > > computer name and try again.
> > >
> > > Tryed using the FQDN with the same result. Tryed using an
> > > lmhost entry with the same result. Any help would be
> > > appreciated. Thank You. LPH!

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Dodo
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-07-2004, 05:01 AM
I suppose assigning two different IP addresses from the same subnet to the
same adapter would effectively be the same as having two nics on the same
subnet. Question is, why assign an adapter two different IP addresses on the
same subnet?


 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-07-2004, 02:11 PM
One common reason is if it is a webserver. You need a separate IP# per each
website unless you want to use Host Headers or varying ports to designate
them. Other than that you are right,...there are very few reason for doing
it.


--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


"Dodo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> I suppose assigning two different IP addresses from the same subnet to the
> same adapter would effectively be the same as having two nics on the same
> subnet. Question is, why assign an adapter two different IP addresses on

the
> same subnet?
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-07-2004, 02:12 PM
About 75% of the time (IMO) it is due to people misunderstanding their needs
and choosing an improper method to accomplish something.

--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


"Dodo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> I suppose assigning two different IP addresses from the same subnet to the
> same adapter would effectively be the same as having two nics on the same
> subnet. Question is, why assign an adapter two different IP addresses on

the
> same subnet?
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-07-2004, 05:27 PM
Doug:

I read the article, but the question still remains, how
can I use a FQDN without getting the error message?

Thanks.

LPH


>-----Original Message-----
>http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...c_tcp_qpzj.asp
>
>Doug Sherman
>MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>
>"Doug Sherman [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)>

wrote in message
>news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Sorry, I now see that you said one NIC. This article

outlines some of the
>> considerations when assigning multiple IP addresses to a

single adapter.
>>
>> Doug Sherman
>> MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>>
>> "Doug Sherman [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)>

wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > You need to change one of these IP addresses. You

should not have 2
>NICs
>> on
>> > the same subnet in a multihomed machine. If the

machine is a domain
>> > controller, your problems will escalate rapidly.
>> >
>> > Doug Sherman
>> > MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>> >
>> > "lph" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in

message
>> > news:2849101c463ab$91205830$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > > Have set up a new 2003 server with one nic. Have

assigned it
>> > > two IP addresses, one is say 192.168.1.40 and the

other is
>> > > 192.168.1.42. The AD is running in prewindows 2000

mode.
>> > >
>> > > From another desktop it can mount a share using the IP
>> > > address, i.e. \\192.168.1.42\d$, but if one tries to use
>> > > say \\apple\d$ than you get the following:
>> > >
>> > > You were not connected because a duplicate name

exists on
>> > > the network. Go to System in Control Panel to

change the
>> > > computer name and try again.
>> > >
>> > > Tryed using the FQDN with the same result. Tryed

using an
>> > > lmhost entry with the same result. Any help would be
>> > > appreciated. Thank You. LPH!
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>
>.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
failover on a multi-homed PC Brian Herbert Withun Windows Networking 0 01-28-2008 02:16 PM
Change DC from multi-homed to single homed segmented Terry Windows Networking 7 03-01-2007 06:13 PM
3 multi-homed phwashington@comcast.net Linux Networking 7 03-01-2006 04:40 AM
Multi-homed server and VPN NeoAdmin Windows Networking 5 04-28-2004 03:52 PM
Multi-homed Server Samuel Shum Windows Networking 9 12-17-2003 07:11 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11