MPLS network - split into sites or have flat.

Hi All
We are opening a branch office and have ordered a 2MB leased line at each
site and an MPLPS network that links them together.
The leased line suppliers think that I do not need to set up seperate
'sites', and that DNS, dhcp and authentication can be done over the WAN link
without too much bandwidth being hogged.
I also use an IT support company, and they tell me using WAN link for dns,
dhcp and authentication would have an adverse effect on the WAN link speed -
and recommend against it. They think I should set up two sites, and so have
inter-site replication which is a more efficient use of bandwidth.
Given out computer needs are failry light and standard (MS Office, Email, an
ERP which would only be accessed from one site only, and some file storage) I
am not sure.
I realise this is quite an open ended question too, but has anyone any
opinions on this please
TIA
Lewej

Use the AD Sites Object.

Anything slower than a fully syncronous (same speed both ways) 10mbps link
is considered "slow". Some might argure that anything less than 100mbps is
"slow".

It is not all about bandwidth either it is about the link being over the
internet which will inevitablly at some point "go down". You want the LANs
to still be survivable in such a case. So have a local DC with DNS, DHCP &
WINS running at the local Site. This will keep local logins and local
authentication functioning if the links drops out.

--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


"Lewej" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:F5838E96-122C-44C5-8FB0-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi All
> We are opening a branch office and have ordered a 2MB leased line at each
> site and an MPLPS network that links them together.
> The leased line suppliers think that I do not need to set up seperate
> 'sites', and that DNS, dhcp and authentication can be done over the WAN
> link
> without too much bandwidth being hogged.
> I also use an IT support company, and they tell me using WAN link for dns,
> dhcp and authentication would have an adverse effect on the WAN link
> speed -
> and recommend against it. They think I should set up two sites, and so
> have
> inter-site replication which is a more efficient use of bandwidth.
> Given out computer needs are failry light and standard (MS Office, Email,
> an
> ERP which would only be accessed from one site only, and some file
> storage) I
> am not sure.
> I realise this is quite an open ended question too, but has anyone any
> opinions on this please
> TIA
> Lewej

Hello Lewej,

Use Active Directory sites and on any site a DC/DNS/DHCP/GC server, so your
users can also work if the WAN link is down for whatever reason.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm

> Hi All
> We are opening a branch office and have ordered a 2MB leased line at
> each
> site and an MPLPS network that links them together.
> The leased line suppliers think that I do not need to set up seperate
> 'sites', and that DNS, dhcp and authentication can be done over the
> WAN link
> without too much bandwidth being hogged.
> I also use an IT support company, and they tell me using WAN link for
> dns,
> dhcp and authentication would have an adverse effect on the WAN link
> speed -
> and recommend against it. They think I should set up two sites, and so
> have
> inter-site replication which is a more efficient use of bandwidth.
> Given out computer needs are failry light and standard (MS Office,
> Email, an
> ERP which would only be accessed from one site only, and some file
> storage) I
> am not sure.
> I realise this is quite an open ended question too, but has anyone any
> opinions on this please
> TIA
> Lewe

Thanks

"Phillip Windell" wrote:

> Use the AD Sites Object.
>
> Anything slower than a fully syncronous (same speed both ways) 10mbps link
> is considered "slow". Some might argure that anything less than 100mbps is
> "slow".
>
> It is not all about bandwidth either it is about the link being over the
> internet which will inevitablly at some point "go down". You want the LANs
> to still be survivable in such a case. So have a local DC with DNS, DHCP &
> WINS running at the local Site. This will keep local logins and local
> authentication functioning if the links drops out.
>
> --
> Phillip Windell
> www.wandtv.com
>
> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> "Lewej" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:F5838E96-122C-44C5-8FB0-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hi All
> > We are opening a branch office and have ordered a 2MB leased line at each
> > site and an MPLPS network that links them together.
> > The leased line suppliers think that I do not need to set up seperate
> > 'sites', and that DNS, dhcp and authentication can be done over the WAN
> > link
> > without too much bandwidth being hogged.
> > I also use an IT support company, and they tell me using WAN link for dns,
> > dhcp and authentication would have an adverse effect on the WAN link
> > speed -
> > and recommend against it. They think I should set up two sites, and so
> > have
> > inter-site replication which is a more efficient use of bandwidth.
> > Given out computer needs are failry light and standard (MS Office, Email,
> > an
> > ERP which would only be accessed from one site only, and some file
> > storage) I
> > am not sure.
> > I realise this is quite an open ended question too, but has anyone any
> > opinions on this please
> > TIA
> > Lewej
>
>
>

Thanks

"Meinolf Weber" wrote:

> Hello Lewej,
>
> Use Active Directory sites and on any site a DC/DNS/DHCP/GC server, so your
> users can also work if the WAN link is down for whatever reason.
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
> > Hi All
> > We are opening a branch office and have ordered a 2MB leased line at
> > each
> > site and an MPLPS network that links them together.
> > The leased line suppliers think that I do not need to set up seperate
> > 'sites', and that DNS, dhcp and authentication can be done over the
> > WAN link
> > without too much bandwidth being hogged.
> > I also use an IT support company, and they tell me using WAN link for
> > dns,
> > dhcp and authentication would have an adverse effect on the WAN link
> > speed -
> > and recommend against it. They think I should set up two sites, and so
> > have
> > inter-site replication which is a more efficient use of bandwidth.
> > Given out computer needs are failry light and standard (MS Office,
> > Email, an
> > ERP which would only be accessed from one site only, and some file
> > storage) I
> > am not sure.
> > I realise this is quite an open ended question too, but has anyone any
> > opinions on this please
> > TIA
> > Lewej
>
>
>