"Chris Hills" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:gdnueq$7i8$(E-Mail Removed)...
> BT claim that their network does not support IPv6 on 21CN, even though the
> wholesale product they sell is IP version agnostic, and it has been
> established that there is a known bug affecting some of their equipment.
>
> A&A have since found that the problem affects not only IPv6, but IPv4 as
> well. BT finally closed the ticket today (after closing a previous ticket,
> presumably so they can claim to meet their targets) referring them to
> their account manager.
>
> Interesting reading:-
>
> http://www.advogato.org/person/dwmw2/rss.xml
> http://david.woodhou.se/bt-clueless-1.html
> http://david.woodhou.se/bt-clueless-2.html
What an eye opener!
Is this typical of ISP - BTW communication?
The systems seem to be churning out auto-responses most
of the time with very little human input.
When it does eventually get "interesting" it degenerates into a
slanging match about who has been rude on the phone.
The system then appears not to cope with the longer
human generated sentences that ensue, and they get
truncated. Perhaps this system needs a Cisco patch
as well.
--
Graham.
%Profound_observation%