On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:21:18 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
<(E-Mail Removed)>:
>John Navas <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>
>>On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:00:05 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
>><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>><(E-Mail Removed)>:
>>>Netstat Live:
>>>| http://www.analogx.com/contents/down...etwork/nsl.htm
>
>>Yeech!
>
>Why? It produces some rather odd numbers at times, but basically
>works. I've used it for years with few suprises.
My take: Poorly programmed. Not terribly accurate.
>I prefer SNMP for obvious reasons. The WEB100 sites you mentioned are
>great for benchmarking, but not monitoring. They don't give a real
>time measure of current up/down speed which is what I thing is being
>asked. Kinda like a speedometer.
>
>Got any favorites?
I personally use Windows XP monitoring, but of course it's not terribly
user friendly.
A number of more friendly and more accurate tools than Netstat Live, but
I'm too lazy (tm JL) to dig them out before bedtime. (Remind me and
I'll dig some up.)
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>