Doug Laidlaw <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Clifford Kite wrote:
>> Doug Laidlaw <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> Originally, my dialup modem would give "No dial tone" if it received
>>> either no dial tone at all, or a "Stutter" dial tone. Now it just
>>> goes through a full cycle, and either reports a timeout or dials
>>> repeatedly. I would like to have it back how it was.
>>
>> How it was before you did what?
>>
> How it was "originally" or, if you like, how Windoze does it. There seems
> to be no way of finding out the Windoze config, and the modem's manual has
> no samples, only sets out the codes.
Ah, Microsoft. It seemed reasonable to assume it once worked satifactory
under Linux.
Then the question I have is, what happened under MS when the modem "would
give "No dial tone?" Did MS simply hangup the modem and quit, or what?
>> Why do you have ATA configured? That directs the modem to answer an
>> incoming call. The Kppp frontend to pppd is not the way to do that.
> It must have been installed by Mandrake that way. I am using a Swann
> Conexant modem with the Linuxant driver. Should I just delete the ATA?
Err.. Yes, unless you want the phone to answer incoming calls, assuming
kppp can even do that. But I have to guess at what the entries in the
configuration screen mean, so no guarantee as to what should or should
not be in the "Answer string:" slot.
< begin partial rant> Some people like KDE and friends and some don't;
I below to the latter group. And I wouldn't ever use a "modem" that
requires a software driver. <end partial rant>
>> What is a "message bank?"
> It is a voicemail at my provider's exchange. When there is a message
> waiting, the normal steady dial tone changes to a "stutter" tone. Since I
> use dialup more often than the family uses the phone, I used to be the
> first to know, because Kppp would respond "no dial tone". The "S6=4" was
> put in at Bill Staehle's suggestion.
Bill is a good man. "S6=4" used to mean "set the waiting time for blind
dialing to 4 seconds," but whether it's still so for every modem these days
is questionable. I don't know what he had in mind here in suggesting it
but don't doubt that he had a valid reason.
> I used to be a lawyer, and lawyers always cover every possibility. Perhaps
> it is a reaction, but now I never say enough.
Weel, the "used to be" means you've achieved some measure of redemption
anyway. VBG
-- Clifford Kite Email: "echo
xvgr_yvahk-(E-Mail Removed)|rot13"
PPP-Q&A links, downloads:
http://ckite.no-ip.net/
/* "PPPoE has many advantages for DSL service providers, and
practically none for DSL consumers."
- David F. Skoll */