"Mike" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:4717ef13$(E-Mail Removed)
: : <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
: : news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
: : : ... However, studies have found out that the
: : : distraction is caused by the conversation itself;
: : : hence, both hand-held and hands-free cell phones
: : : contribute towards road traffic accidents...
: : :
http://personaltechinfo.googlepages....ut_cell_phones
: : :
: :
: : That's probably true. Have you ever driven behind a
: : car in which the driver slows down or brakes when he
: : turns and speaks to the front seat passenger! I see it
: : all the time, it's mainly women or old people that go
: : out at 8-30am to drive at 20 through rush hour.
: : How about banning slow people instead, most of us can
: : use a phone or radio or have a conversation whilst
: : driving.
Some can, some can't. Some people can juggle six balls in the air at one
time as well, people are different. I've been using mobile 2-way radio
both as an amateur and commercially for 25 years, mostly with hand-held
microphones and I haven't had an accident yet. Some people are uninsurable
through the sheer number of collisions they've had.
It's like speed limits. Making the speed limit past a school 20mph makes
sense at 3pm but not at 3am.
Tell you what, how about banning buses as well..? Try driving a
double-decker with 50+ screaming kids on it at school chucking-out time, I
can assure you it's *far* more distracting than any phone call..!
Ivor