Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Network Hardware > Home Networking > Migration of LAN - BNC -> RJ45

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Migration of LAN - BNC -> RJ45

 
 
Stroller
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-20-2003, 03:18 PM
Background: I have solid Windows, Linux & networking experience and
run a /29 subnet of globally addressable IPs on my LAN at home, using
a Vigor2600 router.

I *think* this is a pretty dumb question, but I have no hands-on
experience of BNC networking, as hubs were just becoming affordable
when I started a few years ago.

My girlfriend's father has a small company with a dozen or two
employees in a narrow building on 5 floors. He set up the office
network himself some years ago using BNC which, as I understand it,
effectively snakes through the building, underneath the floorboards &
so on with a T-connector for each PC. He gives his reason for wishing
to upgrade that he finds it hard to buy new PCs with BNC network
cards: I've pointed out that these are easy to obtain 2nd-hand, but
there are other valid reasons for wishing to add in 10base or
10base100 hubs to the network.

My own inclination would be to rip all the cabling out & replace it
with CAT5 cable & cheap 10base100 network switches (perhaps one in
each room to reduce cabling runs), but the lease runs out on the
building in a couple of years, and it's an old building too, so he
wants to disturb the current cabling as little as possible. He's
perfectly happy with 10mBit, and I can see that that there's no point
in fixing something that's largely not broken.

So I've had a think about this, and it seems to be what would be
perfect for him is one or two network hubs, each with a few RJ45
ports, and TWO BNC connectors, so that they could just go inline with
the current BNC network and allow CAT5 expansion. Does such a beast
exist, currently on the market..?

Alternatively, it seems to me that a pair of network hubs, each with 1
BNC port could be stacked and connected by cross-over RJ45. Again,
this pair could be placed anywhere in the middle of the BNC
network-snake. Can anyone confirm for me that this understanding is
correct..?

Has anyone else performed any kind of network upgrade like this..? My
g/f's father was considering Wireless LAN, but considering his network
security I consider this vastly inappropriate, not withstanding the
cost per PC and the number of WLAN base-stations he might need to
accommodate the building's thick walls.

Many thanks for everyone's time & bandwidth, and TIA for any replies
or comments,

Stroller.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Rob Morley
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-20-2003, 04:48 PM
In article <(E-Mail Removed)> ,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
> Background: I have solid Windows, Linux & networking experience and
> run a /29 subnet of globally addressable IPs on my LAN at home, using
> a Vigor2600 router.
>
> I *think* this is a pretty dumb question, but I have no hands-on
> experience of BNC networking, as hubs were just becoming affordable
> when I started a few years ago.
>
> My girlfriend's father has a small company with a dozen or two
> employees in a narrow building on 5 floors. He set up the office
> network himself some years ago using BNC which, as I understand it,
> effectively snakes through the building, underneath the floorboards &
> so on with a T-connector for each PC. He gives his reason for wishing
> to upgrade that he finds it hard to buy new PCs with BNC network
> cards: I've pointed out that these are easy to obtain 2nd-hand, but
> there are other valid reasons for wishing to add in 10base or
> 10base100 hubs to the network.


I think you mean 10BaseT or 100BaseTx there (that's Cat5/Cat5e with
RJ45).
>
> My own inclination would be to rip all the cabling out & replace it
> with CAT5 cable & cheap 10base100 network switches (perhaps one in
> each room to reduce cabling runs), but the lease runs out on the
> building in a couple of years, and it's an old building too, so he
> wants to disturb the current cabling as little as possible. He's
> perfectly happy with 10mBit, and I can see that that there's no point
> in fixing something that's largely not broken.
>
> So I've had a think about this, and it seems to be what would be
> perfect for him is one or two network hubs, each with a few RJ45
> ports, and TWO BNC connectors, so that they could just go inline with
> the current BNC network and allow CAT5 expansion. Does such a beast
> exist, currently on the market..?


Probably not, but you don't need it - a 10BaseT hub with a single BNC
port can be connected to the existing network just like the PCs that are
in it already. Alternatively you could fit a 10/100baseT card to one of
the existing PCs and use it to bridge to a standard RJ45-only hub.
>
> Alternatively, it seems to me that a pair of network hubs, each with 1
> BNC port could be stacked and connected by cross-over RJ45. Again,
> this pair could be placed anywhere in the middle of the BNC
> network-snake. Can anyone confirm for me that this understanding is
> correct..?


Sounds a bit mad to me :-)
 
Reply With Quote
 
Rob Morley
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-20-2003, 05:14 PM
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
> During a perfect moment of peace at 20 Aug 2003 08:18:06 -0700,
> (E-Mail Removed) (Stroller) interrupted with:
>
> >He gives his reason for wishing to upgrade that he finds it hard to buy new PCs with BNC network cards

>
> I've not seen 10base2 cards for a long time. Given 10baseT cards are
> ~£10 and hubs/switches < £100 they can upgrade cheaply.


I guess you didn't read the bit about the cabling then?

> Plus they are probably running at 10Mb/s half duplex,


What else _could_ they be running at?

 
Reply With Quote
 
Stroller
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-22-2003, 11:11 PM
Bernard Peek <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<ZK2Jr2h2B6Q$(E-Mail Removed)>...
> In message <(E-Mail Removed)> , Stroller
> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>
>
>
> >So I've had a think about this, and it seems to be what would be
> >perfect for him is one or two network hubs, each with a few RJ45
> >ports, and TWO BNC connectors, so that they could just go inline with
> >the current BNC network and allow CAT5 expansion. Does such a beast
> >exist, currently on the market..?

>
> You don't need two BNC connectors. You only need one and most old 10Mb
> hubs had one. Just position the hub somewhere convenient, fit a T
> connector to it. Break the existing snake somewhere and connect each
> side of the snake to the T connector. Then all of the other ports on the
> hub are part of the same segment. You may find a 10Mb switch somewhere,
> probably a dumpster.


Perfect! This is EXACTLY the information I was looking for. My father
has 2 of these hubs in stock.

Thanks for your help,

Stroller.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BNC to RJ45 MS Home Networking 9 07-15-2006 02:17 AM
RJ45? jake Wireless Networks 5 03-26-2005 05:55 AM
do i need a rj45 jake Wireless Networks 1 03-10-2005 05:57 PM
rj45 outside Mr Nangla Home Networking 8 07-21-2004 12:10 AM
RJ45 to USB ndroun Windows Networking 1 05-25-2004 01:23 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11