Rizla Ranger UK wrote:
> The orginal BT filters are the best.... by far.
>
>
Um... Yeah. I'd have to agree. I have an original BT filter installed
as the master socket in the house. All the slave sockets are after the
filter, so they're automatically filtered.
I have to say the only problems I've ever had (Apart from an abortive
period with an ISP that went under) were from BT's own bad practices
with regard to BTO's port25 filters, and then a 4 day outage this
month when they deprovisioned me because they thought I was moving for
some reason.
None due to line quality or bad filters... It's good kit...
Oh... My info from the router (Speedtouch)
=>adsl info
Modemstate : up
Operation Mode : G.DMT Annex A [POTS Overlay Mode]
Channel Mode : fast
Number of resets : 1
Vendor Local Remote
Country : 0f 0f
Vendor : ALCB ALCB
VendorSpecific : 0000 0000
StandardRevisionNr : 01 01
Downstream Upstream
Margin [dB] : 31 31
Attenuation [dB] : 32 21
OutputPower [dBm] : 20 12
Available Bandwidth Cells/s Kbit/s
Downstream : 1358 576
Upstream : 679 288
Actually downsteeam attenuation seems higher today... It WAS 22dB the
other night when I looked.
H
>
> "Michael Klontzas" <Michael-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>My cheap microfilter seems to be playing up: audible line noise,
>>phenomenal degradation of analogue modem connection speed, 'weaker' phone
>>ringing and now answerphone problems. Before I get myself a new one, do
>>these problems actually go away with a quality microfilter? Any
>>experiences with any of these:
>>
>>Fujitsu FDX100-UK ADSL Microfilter
>>U.S.Robotics USR ADSL Microfilter
>>Dabsvalue ADSL MicroFilter / Spliter
>>D-Link UK ADSL Microfilter
>>
>>all listed here <http://tinyurl.com/omm2 >
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>--
>>Michael Klontzas
>> Before enlightenment / chopping wood / carrying water
>> After enlightenment / chopping wood / carrying water
>> Zen Proverb
>
>
>
--
I don't suffer from Insanity... | Linux User #16396
I enjoy every minute of it... |
|
http://www.travellingkiwi.com/ |