MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower..... (IQ?)

MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.

Both the quantity and quality of a man’s sperm decline as his daily
mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
United States indicates.

http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:21:58 +0100, Lenny <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.
>
>Both the quantity and quality of a man’s sperm decline as his daily
>mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
>United States indicates.
>
>http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html

"The findings, from a team led by Ashok Agarwal, of the Cleveland
Clinic in Ohio, could indicate that the electromagnetic fields
generated by mobile phone handsets are interfering with sperm
production."

I think you'll find that the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio is a heart
clinic, and there's another one which is a children's hospital.

I think you'll also find that making up shit and posting it to your
blog counts as a scientific study.

Kindest regards,
--
-- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: (E-Mail Removed)
-- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11
-- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:35:09 +0100, BGN wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:21:58 +0100, Lenny <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm
>>counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests
>>radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.
>>
>>Both the quantity and quality of a man;s sperm decline as his daily
>>mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
>>United States indicates.
>>
>>http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html
>
> "The findings, from a team led by Ashok Agarwal, of the Cleveland Clinic
> in Ohio, could indicate that the electromagnetic fields generated by
> mobile phone handsets are interfering with sperm production."
>
> I think you'll find that the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio is a heart clinic,
> and there's another one which is a children's hospital.

Well come on. Make up your mind! LOL


> I think you'll also find that making up shit and posting it to your blog
> counts as a scientific study.

No. I think you should understand that the study is what was REFERRED to
by the owner of the blog. The blog isn't the study you silly person.

> Kindest regards,

cordially, as always.

i've had a vascectomy, so i can talk on my phone all day with no worries!
yippee!


"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f7sreu$1r5$(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:35:09 +0100, BGN wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:21:58 +0100, Lenny <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm
>>>counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests
>>>radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.
>>>
>>>Both the quantity and quality of a man;s sperm decline as his daily
>>>mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
>>>United States indicates.
>>>
>>>http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html
>>
>> "The findings, from a team led by Ashok Agarwal, of the Cleveland Clinic
>> in Ohio, could indicate that the electromagnetic fields generated by
>> mobile phone handsets are interfering with sperm production."
>>
>> I think you'll find that the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio is a heart clinic,
>> and there's another one which is a children's hospital.
>
> Well come on. Make up your mind! LOL
>
>
>> I think you'll also find that making up shit and posting it to your blog
>> counts as a scientific study.
>
> No. I think you should understand that the study is what was REFERRED to
> by the owner of the blog. The blog isn't the study you silly person.
>
>> Kindest regards,
>
> cordially, as always.
>

"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f7sq8k$va2$(E-Mail Removed)...
> MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm
> counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests
> radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.
>
> Both the quantity and quality of a man’s sperm decline as his daily
> mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
> United States indicates.
>
> http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html
>
>
>

Evolution, isn't it. When you look at the people who never seem to be off
the phone then it is probably good for society in general if they are less
likely to breed.

MB

where are you getting your rubbish from....



"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f7sq8k$va2$(E-Mail Removed)...
> MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm
> counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests
> radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.
>
> Both the quantity and quality of a man’s sperm decline as his daily
> mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
> United States indicates.
>
> http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html
>
>
>

"ALi" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:18soi.2641$%(E-Mail Removed) ...
> where are you getting your rubbish from....
>

from the same scientists who insist the world is 6000 years old, and every
word in the bible is absolute truth....

"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f7sq8k$va2$(E-Mail Removed)...
> MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm
> counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests
> radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.
>
> Both the quantity and quality of a man’s sperm decline as his daily
> mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
> United States indicates.
>
> http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html
>
>
>
The reason is that men who are heavy users of mobile phones have much
greater sexual success than you do, typically using the phone to set up
several liaisons a day, whereas it is empirically obvious you haven't had
any for months or years.

Unsurprisingly when these men are tested there isn't a lot left for the
medics.

I suppose you could emulate them by self stimulation or filing a load of
crackpot posts...

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:21:58 +0100, in uk.telecom.broadband , Lenny
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm counts than those who are not

Sure - this has been known about since the early eighties. Its nothing
to do with the phones - men who are heavy users of honkin' big cars
with go-faster stripes and leather steering wheels ALSO have lower
sperm counts.

--
Mark McIntyre

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:42:24 +0100, in uk.telecom.broadband , Lenny
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:35:09 +0100, BGN wrote:
>
>
>> I think you'll also find that making up shit and posting it to your blog
>> counts as a scientific study.
>
>No. I think you should understand that the study is what was REFERRED to
>by the owner of the blog. The blog isn't the study you silly person.

What has that to do with the fact that its all made up claptrap?
--
Mark McIntyre