On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:55:35 +0000 (UTC),
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> Better idea. Leave the chip antenna in place. Cut the trace near the
>> top of FL1 as close to FL1 as possible. Attach the coax center
>> conductor to the top lead of FL1. Connect the ground to the large
>> ground area to the left of FL1. Keep the exposed center conductor
>> *VERY short. C53 apparently acts as a DC isolator from the PIN diode
>> diversity switch chip (half way hanging out from under the shield).
>I'd say that was c35, but I might be reading upside down ;-)
Y'er right. It's C35.
>What about a 35mm monopole sticking up from the board, at the top of FL1,
>poking into a cantenna? I suggest 35mm presuming that the shield seen in
>the photo would be soldered to the side of the can, leave 31.1mm exposed
>inside the can.
>
>http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.html
Incidentally, John Navas wrote a page on build your own antennas:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wifi:Building_an_antenna
The monopole will work, but not as good as a dipole. The reason is
not very subtle. The way the waveguide can antenna works is that the
dipole is roughly 1/4 wave from the bottom of the can. The bottom
acts as a reflector. When the signal from the dipole hits the bottom
of the can it reverses phase and bounces back toward the dipole. When
it hits, it's exactly 360 degrees (in phase) at 2.4GHz. That causes
any signal at the dipole to be reinforced by the reflected wave
bouncing off the bottom of the can. Reinforcement mean gain (a good
thing).
However, if the bottom is not exactly the correct distance from the
dipole feed, then one gets partial reinforcement or at worst,
cancellation. That's the problem with a monopole versus a dipole.
Half the signal is missing and there's no place for anything reflected
off the bottom, on the ground side, to provide signal or gain. The
monopole side of the USB adapter will work, but the antenna gain is
that of an antenna half the diameter.
Drivel: With the common side mounted monopole, the reflecting bottom
is not exactly 0.250000 wavelengths from the dipole feed. It's
usually a bit farther. With a dipole, it will be closer to 0.25
wavelengths. In my non existent spare time, I've been tinkering on a
proper model for the coffee can antenna:
http://members.cruzio.com/~jeffl/crud/coffee-can05.xls
based upon work by Ivor Hewitt.
http://www.ivor.it/wireless/cantenna.html
I can change the monopole feed to a dipole or suspended monopole and
see what happens. The spreadsheet still needs LOTS of work and
checking and is nowhere near done. The results looks something like:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/ant...400/index.html
Note the conical monopole feed. Volunteers and criticism graciously
accepted.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558