Actually, this is dangerous:
> I am not aware of much risk of broadcasting the MAC address of the access
> point itself, apart from just showing that the access point exists.
If I were a malicious person, I'd use SMAC
(
http://www.klcconsulting.net/smac/) and change the MAC address of my
computer to be that of the access point, thus directing all associations to
me. Then I'd immediately send forged 802.11 disassociation messages,
knocking all the clients off the WLAN. If I were feeling especially
malicious, I'd put a timer on it...
Even 802.1X + EAP can't stop this. Only WPA and WPA2 can, since they
incorporate a signed message integrity check called "Michael" (lacking in
802.1X + EAP). Michael will sense the forged frames and drop them.
Steve Riley
(E-Mail Removed)
"Jim Fox" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:8IednXt8J9_xyCrcRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Jim Fox" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:JIOdnS1XTLQ1zircRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> "Gingangooli" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>
>>> Anyone any idea of the security risk to a wireless network of having
>>> your
>>> MAC address showing to the world, if any?
>>>
>> If you have a MAC filter on your wireless access point, then someone
>> could spoof your MAC address and get into your network. That is not much
>> of a risk insofar as I am concerned on a home network, but add WEP or WPA
>> security if you are worried about it.
> I should have said they need the MAC address of your client card that you
> have allowed through the MAC filter. I am not aware of much risk of
> broadcasting the MAC address of the access point itself, apart from just
> showing that the access point exists.
>