Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Lousy Performance

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Lousy Performance

 
 
David Pendleton
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2005, 02:52 AM
Hello all.

Throughput on my small network is lousy. First, here is a brief description
of the topology:

Office:
ISDN LAN Modem w/integrated 10Mb 5-port hub
XPSP2 Workstation (Network Card is 10Mb/Full Duplex)

Basement:
10/100 5-port hub
Several W2KAdv Servers (Network Cards are 100Mb/Full Duplex)

The Office and Basement Hubs are linked.

I regularly copy 4-500MB files from my workstation to various servers. This
can take more than an hour. When I monitor bandwidth using Task Manager, it
rarely goes above 15%. I really wouldn't mind if it pegged the NIC, as long
as it didn't take an hour...

I realize there may be a thousand variable here, but this is a pretty simple
network. I've tried everything I can think of... What should I look for
here?

Thanks all.

David



--
ROT-13 my email address to reply directly


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Todd J Heron
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2005, 03:39 AM
You indicated that your NICs in all your machines are hard-set for 10Mb/Full
Duplex but most inexpensive hubs will allow only 10Mb/Half Duplex. Do you
see a rapidly blinking orange light on your hub during file transfers? That
would mean many collisions are occurring causing the packets to be
re-transmitted which is not efficient. The appearance to the end-user is
network slowness. I would consider getting rid of the hub altogether and
buying a switch. They sell for as little as $40 nowadays a your local
computer store. A switched connection between all your PCs will greatly
improve performance, guaranteed.

http://handsonhowto.com/lan102.html

--
Todd J Heron, MCSE
Windows Server 2003/2000/NT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights


 
Reply With Quote
 
Matt Gibson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2005, 05:06 PM
That seems about right to me.

2GB of data is 16Gb of data.

16Gb of data over a 10Mb link = 1600 seconds.

1600 seconds = 26.66 minutes.

Add the fact that you'll never get usually more than 50% throughput, and
that's about an hour.

Add in overhead on the hub, and yeah...that's about right.

Matt Gibson - GSEC

"David Pendleton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello all.
>
> Throughput on my small network is lousy. First, here is a brief
> description of the topology:
>
> Office:
> ISDN LAN Modem w/integrated 10Mb 5-port hub
> XPSP2 Workstation (Network Card is 10Mb/Full Duplex)
>
> Basement:
> 10/100 5-port hub
> Several W2KAdv Servers (Network Cards are 100Mb/Full Duplex)
>
> The Office and Basement Hubs are linked.
>
> I regularly copy 4-500MB files from my workstation to various servers.
> This can take more than an hour. When I monitor bandwidth using Task
> Manager, it rarely goes above 15%. I really wouldn't mind if it pegged the
> NIC, as long as it didn't take an hour...
>
> I realize there may be a thousand variable here, but this is a pretty
> simple network. I've tried everything I can think of... What should I look
> for here?
>
> Thanks all.
>
> David
>
>
>
> --
> ROT-13 my email address to reply directly
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
David Pendleton
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2005, 10:44 PM
I meant 400 to 500MB files, not 4 500MB files.

Thanks anyway.


"Matt Gibson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> That seems about right to me.
>
> 2GB of data is 16Gb of data.
>
> 16Gb of data over a 10Mb link = 1600 seconds.
>
> 1600 seconds = 26.66 minutes.
>
> Add the fact that you'll never get usually more than 50% throughput, and
> that's about an hour.
>
> Add in overhead on the hub, and yeah...that's about right.
>
> Matt Gibson - GSEC
>
> "David Pendleton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hello all.
>>
>> Throughput on my small network is lousy. First, here is a brief
>> description of the topology:
>>
>> Office:
>> ISDN LAN Modem w/integrated 10Mb 5-port hub
>> XPSP2 Workstation (Network Card is 10Mb/Full Duplex)
>>
>> Basement:
>> 10/100 5-port hub
>> Several W2KAdv Servers (Network Cards are 100Mb/Full Duplex)
>>
>> The Office and Basement Hubs are linked.
>>
>> I regularly copy 4-500MB files from my workstation to various servers.
>> This can take more than an hour. When I monitor bandwidth using Task
>> Manager, it rarely goes above 15%. I really wouldn't mind if it pegged
>> the NIC, as long as it didn't take an hour...
>>
>> I realize there may be a thousand variable here, but this is a pretty
>> simple network. I've tried everything I can think of... What should I
>> look for here?
>>
>> Thanks all.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ROT-13 my email address to reply directly
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
David Pendleton
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2005, 11:34 PM
Solved my own problem...

Setting both network cards link speed and duplex to 'Auto Detect' did the
trick.

I just copied a 385MB file in a little over 5 minutes.

Thanks to all that responded.

"David Pendleton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello all.
>
> Throughput on my small network is lousy. First, here is a brief
> description of the topology:
>
> Office:
> ISDN LAN Modem w/integrated 10Mb 5-port hub
> XPSP2 Workstation (Network Card is 10Mb/Full Duplex)
>
> Basement:
> 10/100 5-port hub
> Several W2KAdv Servers (Network Cards are 100Mb/Full Duplex)
>
> The Office and Basement Hubs are linked.
>
> I regularly copy 4-500MB files from my workstation to various servers.
> This can take more than an hour. When I monitor bandwidth using Task
> Manager, it rarely goes above 15%. I really wouldn't mind if it pegged the
> NIC, as long as it didn't take an hour...
>
> I realize there may be a thousand variable here, but this is a pretty
> simple network. I've tried everything I can think of... What should I look
> for here?
>
> Thanks all.
>
> David
>
>
>
> --
> ROT-13 my email address to reply directly
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Matt Gibson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-25-2005, 11:16 PM
Doh!

Ah well, got me to break out the old calculator anyway

Glad to hear you got it solved!

Matt Gibson - GSEC
"David Pendleton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I meant 400 to 500MB files, not 4 500MB files.
>
> Thanks anyway.
>
>
> "Matt Gibson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> That seems about right to me.
>>
>> 2GB of data is 16Gb of data.
>>
>> 16Gb of data over a 10Mb link = 1600 seconds.
>>
>> 1600 seconds = 26.66 minutes.
>>
>> Add the fact that you'll never get usually more than 50% throughput, and
>> that's about an hour.
>>
>> Add in overhead on the hub, and yeah...that's about right.
>>
>> Matt Gibson - GSEC
>>
>> "David Pendleton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> Throughput on my small network is lousy. First, here is a brief
>>> description of the topology:
>>>
>>> Office:
>>> ISDN LAN Modem w/integrated 10Mb 5-port hub
>>> XPSP2 Workstation (Network Card is 10Mb/Full Duplex)
>>>
>>> Basement:
>>> 10/100 5-port hub
>>> Several W2KAdv Servers (Network Cards are 100Mb/Full Duplex)
>>>
>>> The Office and Basement Hubs are linked.
>>>
>>> I regularly copy 4-500MB files from my workstation to various servers.
>>> This can take more than an hour. When I monitor bandwidth using Task
>>> Manager, it rarely goes above 15%. I really wouldn't mind if it pegged
>>> the NIC, as long as it didn't take an hour...
>>>
>>> I realize there may be a thousand variable here, but this is a pretty
>>> simple network. I've tried everything I can think of... What should I
>>> look for here?
>>>
>>> Thanks all.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ROT-13 my email address to reply directly
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wep vs. wpa performance Japhy Wireless Internet 7 06-27-2007 01:40 AM
lousy wireless router barely works even 50 feet away thru air sdowney717@msn.com Wireless Internet 4 03-28-2006 10:45 PM
Orinoco b/g Gold -- Nice hardware, lousy client utility? X_HOBBES Wireless Internet 3 06-11-2005 06:11 PM
Dlink g604t: lousy performance ? susanbarnesus Broadband 2 03-20-2005 12:26 PM
Lousy dial-up but apparently OK for broadband Peter Montgomery Broadband 10 11-24-2003 05:38 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11