On 27 Jun 2005 03:10:37 -0700, "sam1967" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>Thanks yet again. In your experience have you seen such a high level
>of RX Errors and for the link to still function ?
>Is it quite acceptable for this level in your experience or would you
>definitely want to tweak some settings to reduce it ?
It depends on the cause. A wired ethernet connection will typically
have about 1-5% errors caused by collisions. My dedicated wireless
bridge links typically run about 3-5% with ocassional very short term
excursions as high as 30% caused by microwave ovens. I have a
marginal cross town link that runs about 15% average and getting worse
by the month. You're apparently running at 50% or higher error rate,
which is totally unacceptable.
CRC errors are basically corrupted packets arriving at the receive
end. The sources can be numerous, complex, and mutual interactive.
In some cases, the radio link can cause these errors in its heroic
attempt to maximize transmission speed or deal with a bottleneck (i.e.
sending more data than the link can handle). Since you've supplied
absolutely zero detail as to what you're doing, where the numbers are
coming from, and with what hardware, I won't speculate as to the cause
or nature of the packet loss.
However, I can suggest that you consider a few tweaks which may help.
1. Turn on CTS/RTS flow.
2. Lower the fragmentation threshold so that you are sending smaller
packets with a higher probability of arriving.
3. Fix the data rate to the slowest OFDM speed (6Mbits/sec) to
improve receive sensitivity.
4. Improve the path by using larger antennas to increase fade margin.
5. Use directional antennas to reduce interference pickup from the
sides (but not inline).
6. Monitor and graph using SNMP and MRTG to get a feel for the
extent, time, and severity of any interference, atmospherics, or path
problems.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558