Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Looking to spend less than $500 in addition to my current parts. . .

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Looking to spend less than $500 in addition to my current parts. . .

 
 
Ecnalyr
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-03-2008, 12:14 AM

to build a decent machine.

I have a spare case, a spare version of Windows Vista Basic, 400 watt
power supply, hard drive, a cheap crt monitor, dvdrw. . . basically
everything but a motherboard, ram, and cpu.

Would it be in my best interest to spend less than 500 dollars on a
motherboard, ram (at least 2gb), and a cpu to build my own set up - or
would it be cheaper to purchase a prebuilt desktop? I know generally it
is hard to build extremely low-cost computers that compete with mass
produced low cost prebuilt desktops, but i'm in this price range with
the extra hardware/OS lying around.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

PS. If you had 500 to spend on a motherboard, ram, and cpu, what would
you purchase?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://www.wirelessforums.org/showthread.php?t=36053
http://www.wirelessforums.org

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bob Willard
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-03-2008, 04:23 AM
Ecnalyr wrote:

> to build a decent machine.
>
> I have a spare case, a spare version of Windows Vista Basic, 400 watt
> power supply, hard drive, a cheap crt monitor, dvdrw. . . basically
> everything but a motherboard, ram, and cpu.
>
> Would it be in my best interest to spend less than 500 dollars on a
> motherboard, ram (at least 2gb), and a cpu to build my own set up - or
> would it be cheaper to purchase a prebuilt desktop? I know generally it
> is hard to build extremely low-cost computers that compete with mass
> produced low cost prebuilt desktops, but i'm in this price range with
> the extra hardware/OS lying around.
>
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> PS. If you had 500 to spend on a motherboard, ram, and cpu, what would
> you purchase?


I'd start with WinXP, not Vista. Vista has a Back To The Future feel, with
the daily/hourly BSODs.
--
Cheers, Bob
 
Reply With Quote
 
DevilsPGD
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-03-2008, 06:32 AM
In message <-(E-Mail Removed)> Bob Willard
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I'd start with WinXP, not Vista. Vista has a Back To The Future feel, with
>the daily/hourly BSODs.


If you're seeing BSODs in Vista, I'd look at your hardware and drivers
very closely, Vista has proven to be the most stable OS I've ever used.

That being said, I selected my parts for this system with Vista
compatibility in mind, so not only was Vista not an issue, but nor was
the switch to x64.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ADSLGuide: People spend more time online, than on holiday Orite Broadband 1 08-08-2006 11:50 AM
Wireless addition David Bradley Broadband 6 06-07-2005 01:15 AM
Bulldog/C&W to spend £100million on LLU Sunil Sood Broadband 7 09-22-2004 06:34 PM
Wireless addition? Marty Windows Networking 1 12-22-2003 03:19 AM
Double check before I spend my money ! Happy Dave Broadband 1 09-25-2003 08:59 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11