On 16 Jan 2006 17:23:48 -0800, in alt.internet.wireless , "Steven
Feil" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>One feature that I would need is a router with detachable antenna.
Quite a few support this - I have an SMC WBR2804 that has two
detachable antennae.
>A second feature is that I need is to be able to make a verifiable
>wifi connection to the router even when the router is not connected to
>the Internet.
all routers can do this, the wireless side is not dependent on the
internet side.
>This router would connect to a second router that is connected to the
>Internet. This could be a wired Ethernet connect or a wifi connection.
Doing this wired is easy. Doing it wireless requires specific relay
hardware, and will be trickier. Few if any retail routers or APs can
act simultaneously as an AP and retransmitter. There /are/ a few, but
the cost is that you halve the performance for each retransmit leg,
and by the way, I recall that the same channel is used for both sides.
>Because it might easer to convince the person with the net
>connection if I don't need to connect his router with Ethernet.
This sounds like youre trying to 'borrow' someone else's internet
connection. I trust this is being done above-board and with consent
from the owner and ISP.
>In addition feature that could come in handy is ip masquerading,
This definitely sounds dodgy. What do you mean by this? All routers
offer NAT capability, for what its worth. There's no need to further
conceal your real address.
>If your asking why I don't just get the ISP to service my place It
>would take a whole 'nother long post to describe that.
Which makes it sound even more dodgy... :-)
Mark McIntyre
--
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----