"Dana" <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>> Clear line of sight? If not, forget it.
>
>Not really true. As it is dependent on many factors.
Really true but not for the obvious reason. NLOS (non-line of sight)
is a problem not because you can't get a connection over the path.
It's a problem becuase you can't maintain a connection over an
obstructed path. Objects inside the Fresnel Zone cause all kinds of
weird reflections, refractions, and blockages. Move anything a few cm
in any direction and the path loss changes. Multipath just rips error
rate because the reflected delayed signal arrives just when the next
indicdent path packet arrives, causing them to clobber each other.
It is possible to do NLOS, but only if you have enough fade margin to
compensate for the huge variations in propagation characteristics, and
the perfect timing needed to deal with the multipath.
Even clear line of sight paths are not good enough for commercial
microwave installations. Many have multiple radios and antennas for
frequency diversity (to avoid frequency selective fadeing) and spacial
diversity (to avoid atmospheric refraction). Of course, the longer
the distance, the worse the problem.
In addition, there's the not so trivial problem of Fresnel Zone
clearance. See:
<http://www.terabeam.com/support/calculations/fresnel-zone.php>
Even a "block and a half" is a problem if the antennas are close to
the ground (i.e. pointed through a window). My guess is that a "block
and a half" is about 1000ft or 0.19 miles. That requires 8.1 ft
radius clearance about the midpoint. That implies that the antennas
on both ends have to be at least 8.1 ft off the ground, or the Fresnel
Zone is going to hit the ground.
However, you're correct. It does depend on many factors, all of which
conspire against NLOS being usable.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558