(E-Mail Removed) (Rico) hath wroth:
>In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>It's not enough for Linksys to kill the golden goose (WRT54G v1 - v4
>>with Linux) and replace it with an abortion (v5). Now, they removed
>>the only useful piece of information on their web pile:
>> http://www.linksysdata.com/ui/
>>This URL formely has simulations (emulations?) of all Linksys
>>products. I could tell what I was buying by looking at the available
>>options on the web based setup. I also used these pages to answer
>>many questions on Linksys configuration issues. Now, all I get is:
>>
>> Forbidden
>> You don't have permission to access /ui/ on this server.
>> Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to
>> use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
>>
>>Hopefully, this is only a temporary failure, or adminstrative screwup.
>>I guess I get to spend the evening writing nastygrams.
>Might be an oops or a crashed Hard drive, drop them a note and see if they
>respond.
I forgot to send a nastygram. I just sent one to "support" and to
"linksyswebfeedback" (first step). I'll escalate after they return
the usual scripted answer.
Incidentally, the domain linksysdata.com expires on July 17, 2006.
>As to the version 5 of the WRT54G(S), keep in mind 99.99% of
>consumers buying this stuff have no clue why the V5 isn't an 'improved'
>version of the 1 -4. It's shiney new and sounds good, so it must be
>better...
Yeah, I know the logic. I've been told that the return rate on V5
routers is much higher than "acceptable". Sorry, no numbers. Cisco
has a "hands off" policy when dealing with Linksys, mostly because
it's a totally different business model. I'm sure they know about
articles like:
|
http://www.tomsnetworking.com/2006/0..._lousy_router/ (7 pages)
but as long as the GUM (great unwashed masses) keep buying the V5
routers, they're not going to do anything. Fortunately, there are
plenty of other hackable routers:
|
http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware
Incidentally, note that the Tom's Hardware reports shows that the V5
does better than the V4 for simultaneous upload and download
benchmarks. See Fig 9.
|
http://www.tomsnetworking.com/2006/0...ter/page4.html
The v5 also bombed the Peer to Peer test:
|
http://www.tomsnetworking.com/2006/0...ter/page5.html
However, there's hope with 3rd party firmware:
|
http://www.bitsum.com/openwiking/owb...?WRT54G5%5FCFE
|
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php...rsion_5_WRT54G
>Seems like prices for version 3's on ebay are climbing (winning bids),
>don't understand why some bright boy at Cisco hasn't noticed this.
Yep. I've noticed. It's prima facia proof that the demand for Linux
versions are still there.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558