On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:09:24 -0600, Spam Me Please spoketh
>Interesting idea. I was thinking along the same lines. I wonder what
>is the difference in using an actual access point instead of a bridge?
The bride is to connect one or more wired clients to a network, while an
access point is to connect one or more wireless clients to a network...
>
>Thanks
>
>>>>>> ">>" == <e> writes:
>
> >>> Hi all, I am thinking about buying an ethernet to wireless bridge
> >>> (Linksys WT-54g). I would like to connect the bridge to my Linux
> >>> server which need to act as DHCP/NAT/gateway etc server. In fact,
> >>> the Linux gw should act as a kind of wireless gateway for all the
> >>> wireless clients connecting by the bridge. Is this setup
> >>> possible?
>
> >>> Thanks, Rene
>
Lars M. Hansen
www.hansenonline.net
Remove "bad" from my e-mail address to contact me.