I've also been doing a little homework, and actually think I now
understand the differences between a router, wireless access point
(WAP), and bridge. In addition to the configuration/operating modes of
each. Now the trick as I see it, is to carefully read the
documentation of each 'multi-capable'device. There are combination
routers/wap/gateways, wap/bridge, etc. and just because something is
supposedly multi-capable doesn't mean that it operates in exactly the
same way, or can be configured in the same way as the individual mode
device. Therein lies the trick. And the moral of this whole story is
to draw out and design your network first, then configure it with the
easiest, most basic type of devices and determine what their operating
mode needs to be, THEN you can look at multi-capable devices to see IF
they can be used in place of the indivdual capable ones.
Tornado <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<bj3e9s$joq$(E-Mail Removed)>...
> Tornado wrote:
>
> >
> > I noticed that the 54g AP and router cost about the same. Why would
> > anyone want to buy the AP when you could get all the wireless
> > functionality, plus a lot more, from the router?
> >
> > Are there wireless performance differences between the AP and the router?
> >
>
> I took a cursory look at the user guides for these boxes and found some
> differences in the wireless functions: The AP can operate in bridging
> mode which allows two AP's to communicate with each other. It also has
> some wirelss fine-tuning parameters.
>
> I'll go with the router since it has router functions and I won't need
> any of the extra wireless features offered by the WAP. For those who
> are considering the options, it is trivial to configure the router to
> use it as an access point: simply turn off the DHCP server on the
> router, and connect any of the LAN ports on the WRT54G to your main LAN
> switch/router. Voila, you have just added 3 more ports to your LAN!
|