Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Linksys/Cisco WRT54G V5 - tracroute bug

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Linksys/Cisco WRT54G V5 - tracroute bug

 
 
DooDah
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-04-2006, 03:04 AM
Recently had a Linksys WRT54G (v1.0) fail, so went to the closest store and
purchased a replacement. My bad for not reading the press, as I brought home a
v5 version.

With the latest available firmware, v1.00.6, I've discovered that the router
doesn't properly support (of all things) traceroute - the first link returned in
the trace is the destination address.

Here's a sample of what happens:

Trace www.linksys.com (66.161.11.20)
1 66.161.11.20 1ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (webgod.linksys.com ok)

This is a UDP based trace, and it never proceeds past the above. A Windows
generated (ICMP based) trace yields similar results:

Tracing route to webgod.linksys.com [66.161.11.20]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms 1 ms <1 ms webgod.linksys.com [66.161.11.20]
2 ...

.... although it does continue to completion.

I started out attempting to resolve this with Linksys's "live chat" tech
support, and was unsuccessful (although with all due credit to the tech
involved, he recognized that there was a problem that would need to be elevated
to level 2 support and gave me a phone number and case ID for that purpose).

However, I've now been through three telephone calls without resolution of the
problem. Even though I give the case ID, I have to explain the entire situation
to whoever answers the phone again - and I don't think I've actually spoken to a
senior tech yet (and I've now got three different case ID's). Oddly enough, the
techs keep asking "why do you want to use traceroute?" - which shouldn't be an
issue, I'd think.

I've now been told that I will be emailed a new firmware update that will take
care of the problem. Since I'm already running the current release, I can only
guess that I'll be getting either a prerelease version, or that I'm going to get
to beta test.

It leaves me wondering though - if they can't get something as simple as
traceroute to work properly with the new revision, what else may be broken?
Linksys was some pretty good stuff before Cisco took over - it's a shame that
they're crippling a good product. It's somewhat reminiscent of when 3Com took
over US Robotics and nearly ruined the brand reputation before spinning it back
off to a separate operating unit, although they've never quite recovered to the
outstanding level of support they provided previously.

So - does anyone reading this have experience with the WRT54GL version? I've
read that it's based on the WRT54G V4, which seems to be less flaky according to
what I've read, and was wondering if anyone has any experience they'd be willing
to share (positive or negative). Specifically, does traceroute work properly?

In the meantime, I'd recommend avoiding the WRT54G V5 at least until the bugs
are fixed.


--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
William P.N. Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-04-2006, 04:24 AM
DooDah <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>With the latest available firmware, v1.00.6, I've discovered that the router
>doesn't properly support (of all things) traceroute - the first link returned in
>the trace is the destination address.


I saw that the other day at a client, didn't have time to follow up on
it, and thought it was me. Lemme pull a new one off the shelf...

Yup, 1.00.4 does it as well. Urg. Beat on them, and drop me a line
if you ever get a FW upgrade that works.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-04-2006, 04:58 AM
William P.N. Smith <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:

>DooDah <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>With the latest available firmware, v1.00.6, I've discovered that the router
>>doesn't properly support (of all things) traceroute - the first link returned in
>>the trace is the destination address.

>
>I saw that the other day at a client, didn't have time to follow up on
>it, and thought it was me. Lemme pull a new one off the shelf...
>
>Yup, 1.00.4 does it as well. Urg. Beat on them, and drop me a line
>if you ever get a FW upgrade that works.


Deja Vu. Different Linksys model (WRT55AG v2) but apparently the same
traceroute problem:
| http://groups.google.com/group/alt.i...2d03cbb4c21d1a

--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
DooDah
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-05-2006, 12:28 AM
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Jeff Liebermann says...
>
>William P.N. Smith <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>
>>DooDah <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>With the latest available firmware, v1.00.6, I've discovered that
>>>the router doesn't properly support (of all things) traceroute -
>>>the first link returned in the trace is the destination address.

>>
>>I saw that the other day at a client, didn't have time to follow up on
>>it, and thought it was me. Lemme pull a new one off the shelf...
>>
>>Yup, 1.00.4 does it as well. Urg. Beat on them, and drop me a line
>>if you ever get a FW upgrade that works.

>
>Deja Vu. Different Linksys model (WRT55AG v2) but apparently the same
>traceroute problem:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.i...2d03cbb4c21d1a
>


That actually appears to be a slightly different problem - in this case, tracert
from Windows (using ICMP) works - traceroute from *nix (using UDP) doesn't.

Actually, after a number of telephone calls, Linksys did email me a beta BIOS
revision that's supposed to fix the problem - unfortunately, too late for me to
test. I located a v4 model still in stock at a local Office Depot, so bought it
and returned the v5 to the Staples store where it came from. (I usually buy
online, but when the connection is down and the wife can't read her mail, one
tends to take the most expeditious route available).

As an interesting aside, this partiuclar v4 was shipped from warehouse stock on
21 Mar 06 (according to the label on the side), so Office Depot may be a
reasonably good bet for others looking for a pre-V5 version to avoid having to
pay the additional price for the WRT54GL which, according to all reports I've
seen, is essentially a V4 anyway.


--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

 
Reply With Quote
 
William P.N. Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-05-2006, 01:57 AM
DooDah <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Actually, after a number of telephone calls, Linksys did email me a beta BIOS
>revision that's supposed to fix the problem - unfortunately, too late for me to
>test. I located a v4 model still in stock at a local Office Depot, so bought it
>and returned the v5 to the Staples store where it came from.


Could you Email it to me, and I'll try it for you? My address in the
header is valid for a while...

Thanks!
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cisco 350 connects to Linksys WAP, not to Linksys ADSL router: helpwith diagnosing? Henry Law Wireless Internet 1 09-26-2005 06:13 PM
Linksys WRT54G and Cisco Aironet 350 on Mandrake 10.1 Kevin the Drummer Linux Networking 7 04-10-2005 12:57 AM
Setting static route: Linksys WRT54G - Cisco 2514 Jason Williard Network Routers 1 03-12-2005 02:00 PM
Re: Linksys WRT54G and Linksys BEFSR41 (Two Router setup) Michael Grigat Wireless Internet 1 07-22-2003 02:52 AM
Re: Linksys WRT54G and Linksys BEFSR41 (Two Router setup) Bob Hall Wireless Internet 0 07-22-2003 01:20 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11