Well I was just thinking that the WAP54G supposedly has the same kind of
radio setup as the WRT54G. Since the WRT54G as a stock unit both sends
and receives through both antennas simultaneously, I thought it might
work. Maybe <G>
I was thinking that if you had two workstations right next to the WAP
with one say working off the right antenna because of proximity and the
other working off the opposite antenna and then both pcs talking to the
router through the WAP, it seems like it should work. (Like my nice
run-on sentence structure? <G>) So the only lose end would be whether or
not the 3rd pc could be plugged in the ethernet port in the WAP and
access the same data as the others? The user guide is somewhat ambiguous
about this and I think the Linksys support team has died. The online
support chat representative told me that I should try and use the WAP as
it was recommended in the documentation that came with the thing. Then I
was told to have a nice day and he hung up. I subsequently fainted, much
like a goat would do.
dep_blueman wrote:
>I understand and in general it seems like it MIGHT work but it is not
>the way the AP was designed to work. I just don't know.
>
>That is why I suggested the 2 bridge solution as I know that would
>work. I should have said that in my orgional post.
>
>-D
>
>Excalibur <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<40196de7$0$32587$(E-Mail Removed) om>...
>
>
>>dep_blueman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>If I understand you want to create a two antenna bridge between your
>>>most distant building and your wireless router via an intermediate
>>>building.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I am asking if a WAP54G wireless access point will work for that
>>configuration. If that access point in the middle building can have one
>>panel antenna pointed towards the Omni from the DHCP router and the same
>>middle building AP second panel antenna pointed towards the 3rd end
>>building. Then in addition to that, could the ethernet pot on the same
>>middle building access point be connected to a wired pc? Would the
>>actual poorly drawn schematic work as listed below? If not, is there
>>another comparably priced G AP that would work? Or am I missing
>>something? 
>>
>>
>>
>>>Excalibur <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<4018c0d7$0$32589$(E-Mail Removed) om>...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> (Wired PC Enet Port to AP)
>>>>Building Omni---> <---Panel Middle building AP Panel---> <--- Building Panel
>>>> Sea Level 400'Dist.+200'Elv. 400'+200' Elv.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>