On Sun, 21 May 2006 20:53:07 +0100, "xxxxxxxxxx" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>"Im aTroll" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:e4qevi$1c6$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> "xxxxxxxxxx" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:4470b7e1$0$18223$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> James
>>>
>>> Where would you go?
>>>
>>> If you are referring to the poor speed problems due to AdslMax they have
>>> more to do with BT than the ISPs.
>>
>> Here you go...
>> http://www.dslzoneuk.net/distance.php
>>
>> And next time, please don't top post. Thanks.
>>
>
>
>Can't apologise since I don't know what " top post " means. If you explain I
>will avoid doing it again.
>
Top posting means placing the text of your response at the top of the
post - i.e. before the text to which you are responding, meaning that
those who want the context have to read the paragraphs in a disjointed
order.
>This link dosn't help since it gives a distance "as the crow flies" . Hardly
>the length of the line since it is well known they follow roads and go round
>corners - all increasing the lenth of cable.
I don't think there are any now which will give an actual estimate of
line length, and TBH it really isn't important anyhow.
They will now attempt to give you ADSL no matter what length your line
is, and the actual attenuation and SNR are what matter, regardless of
the line length, which is only very roughly related.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom