In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
NoNeedToKnow <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
> Out of interest, with aluminimum-backed plasterboard, and other
> possible materials (eg the safety glass with thin wire grid in
> it), would something akin to a Faraday cage protect one room,
> or is that, too, not really viable for the low cost of kit,
> or just wouldn't be sufficient, and merely lull one into a
> sense of false security about it ?
It depends what you want to protect against. That sort of
thing might be appropriate for avoiding damage in a direct
hit, but they are rare compared with nearby hits which come
in via services (mains, phone, ...) as in the OP's case.
After a direct hit, you are going to need to rewire the
whole house and possibly rebuild parts of it anyway,
although lightning conductors can reduce that sort of
damage.
Protecting against spikes coming in on services is easier.
You basically have to arrange they all enter nearby each
other, and are cross-bonded. In the case of mains and phone
wiring where you can't just earth all the wires, appropriate
lighning filters need fitting and cross-bonding with the
other services. This prevents voltage spikes appearing
between services inside the house. A decent lighning filter
will cost more than a new router and a couple of NIC cards
though ;-)
> I only ask, as I rarely
> turn kit off, so would be away from home/office (can only be in
> one place!) if there was a thunderstorm, so one or other could
> be hit.
I don't know that being switched on or off is likely to make
much difference to the damage.
--
Andrew Gabriel
|