"Netcom mbickers" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:cc1eti$rv6$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is there any way to obtain details on what the rationale is / was for
> considering any particular exchange as non-viable?
You can ask BT..
Try Paul Reynolds, BT Wholesale's Chief Executive at BT Centre, 81 Newgate
St, London EC1A 7AJ or even Ben Verwaayen, BT CEO at the same address.
BT have said though that all exchanges without an RFS date have less than
300 customers on them, with some having as low as 7 customers connected.
> Our exchange Broadfield - 01763 288XXX is the only exchange in
> Hertfordshire to not be updated. All other local exchanges off the main
> Royston exchange - 01763 xxxxxx are in the plan. Many of them appear to
> share similar characteristics to Broadfield, small building serving small
> population clusters, so what is the difference?
Even though they appear to be similar - there will be some difference,
otherwise BT would have gone ahead and enabled it
> To help in any local discussions on how / when / at what cost we can get a
> Broadband service it would be extremely usfull to have some of the
> background data.
If you (as a group) can find the money, you may still be able be able to get
ADSL based on BT's ADSL Exchange Activate scheme.
Some details are at
http://www.serviceview.bt.com/list/c...s.boo/1213.htm
Regards
Sunil