Correction: I meant to say KB918997 (instead of KB893357) in the P.S. as
shown below.
P.S. There is also now, KB918997 (Feb 16, 2007) which replaces the same
files (plus one
more, I think) and is later than KB917021. I would like to know if I should
install it.
"Lilla" <lilla@earthlink-removetoreply-.net> wrote in message
news:eR%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Here's the WORKAROUND that I used to resolve this problem...
>
> A few days ago I tried to install KB917021 (it replaces KB893357 which I
> had never installed) on my IBM ThinkPad 770ED (Pentium II 266MHZ) running
> Windows XP Home SP2 with all critical updates provided by Windows Updates
> I received this message:
> KB917021 Setup Error (title)
> Failed to migrate dependent packages
>
> I restarted the computer, and then uninstalled the package.
> To uninstall, run spuninst.exe, located here...
> C:\WINDOWS\$NtUninstallKB917021$\spuninst\spuninst .exe
> Notes. This is a hidden folder. This uninstaller is not listed in
> Add/Remove Programs.
>
> After uninstalling, I restarted the computer.
>
> Next I googled the problem and found where another person had encountered
> the same problem and had shared a workaround that had worked for them.
> Workaround: rename xpsp3res.dll to xpsp3res_hideme.dll (or whatever)
> (this file is part of this update, see KB917021)
>
> I decided to try this workaround. So I renamed the file and reinstalled
> and this time I did not get the error message. I restarted the computer.
>
> Observation:
> Before installing this update, xpsp3res.dll was version 5.1.2600.3100
> Before installing this update, xpsp3res.dll was version 5.1.2600.2977
>
> It seems odd that this file version regressed. Perhaps someone can tell me
> if this workaround will have negative consequences, and what should be
> done.
>
> P.S. There is also now, KB893357 which replaces the same files (plus one
> more, I think) and is later than KB917021. I would like to know if I
> should install it.
>
>
> "Phil C." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> I've been having problems with my wireless lenovo laptop Win Xp Pro Sp2,
>> all updates to date with Intel 3945abg wireless card and dhcp errors, and
>> having it drop the wireless connection
>> and not reconnect.
>>
>> Your computer was not able to renew its address from the network (from
>> the DHCP Server) for the Network Card with network address 0018DE746057.
>> The following error occurred:
>> The operation was canceled by the user. . Your computer will continue to
>> try and obtain an address on its own from the network address (DHCP)
>> server.
>> The semaphore timeout period has expired. . Your computer will continue
>> to try and obtain an address on its own from the network address (DHCP)
>> server.
>> Your computer was unable to automatically configure the IP parameters for
>> the Network Card with the network address 0018DE746057. The following
>> error occurred during configuration: The DHCP client has obtained an IP
>> address that is already in use on the network. The local interface will
>> be disabled until the DHCP client can obtain a new address. .
>>
>> In trying to figure out how to fix this (I'm assuming the router, a SMC
>> 2804WBRP-G is configured correctly with WPA PSK, a long key and a 3600
>> sec group rekeying interval)
>>
>> The Intel drivers and Ibm Thinkvantage software has been configured and
>> reinstalled correctly per IBM/Lenovo.
>>
>> I was researching KB893357 "The Wi-Fi Protected Access 2 (WPA2)/Wireless
>> Provisioning Services Information Element (WPS IE) update for Windows XP
>> with Service Pack 2 is available" which is installed on my machine,
>> and KB917021 "Description of the Wireless Client Update for Windows XP
>> with Service Pack 2", which is newer and contains newer dll's and
>> replaces KB893357.
>>
>> I thought that applying KB917021 which is not pushed out throught the
>> Windows Update might help the dropped connection issues. However, when I
>> try to run KB917021, I get an error saying that it can't be applied
>> because of dependency conflicts.
>>
>> I wonder if uninstalling KB893357 first, than installing KB917021 would
>> work. However, I'm not sure exactly what KB917021 helps me with.
>> Any Help would be appreciated
>>
>
>
|