"slickric" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:C8E0A528-689D-4110-9C13-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Bill, thx for help and advice. I had switched a member server now. But
> still couldn't accomplish my goal. Is there any solution could solve my
> problem?
"I had switched a member server now"..? I don't know what that means.
It just comes down to this:
1. DCs should not be multi-homed (also means no RRAS).
2. DCs commonly run DNS, DHCP, and WINS on the same box. That is fine.
3. Run everything else on a different box.
The Public Use segment should connect into a Tri-homed DMZ interface on the
"firewall". It doesn't matter if the firewall is "proxy based" or "nat
based". It also does not matter if the firewall is an "appliance" or a
"PC",..a firewall is still a firewall.
Since you have DSL you might already have a NAT Firewall on the end of the
DSL to begin with,...in which case causes you to have [possibly unkowingly]
a Back-to-Back DMZ between the "proxy" and the DSL NAT Firewall. This also
can make a big difference in how this is approached,...so knowing those
details is important.
There's probably a bunch of other things to deal with and look out for but I
don't know enough about the situation to comment futher.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------