Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > It's true, Atheros Chips are 2.4GHz Jammers!

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

It's true, Atheros Chips are 2.4GHz Jammers!

 
 
Mike Harris
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-01-2004, 11:57 PM
The D-Link DI-624 that I have is Atheros based. Since it's revision C,
it has the channel bonding technology to deliver twice the speed of
regular G. It does work. Great speed! I am using it in G only mode
with Dynamic Turbo option (SuperG). The access cards are D-Link's G
based as well so they support SuperG as well.

I re-hooked my Linksys BEFW11S4 (802.11B) router to service two of my
laptops for two reasons: a. both don't have WPA capability in their
access cards, and b. I didn't want the whole of G setup suffer because
of these B accesses.

I have noticed that whenever there is wireless activity on the G side,
the traffic on the Linksys router just stops for the full duration.

I am using channel 6 on the D-Link (the only channel you can select if
wanting SuperG mode). And on the B side I am using channel 11 (I tried
other channel numbers as well but none helped).

This is consistent with findings on various websites as well.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mobile phone jammers Mr Benn Broadband 38 12-22-2009 06:05 PM
A True Scientific Breakthrough That Makes It Possible To Fulfill Ones True Potential! Jeffrey Bruce Home Networking 0 06-16-2008 09:48 PM
Compatibility of 2.4Ghz Router with 2.4Ghz CCTV Howard Neil Home Networking 7 04-07-2006 08:47 AM
usb firewire cables and chips Let me Think Home Networking 1 11-26-2005 02:33 PM
BIOS CHIPS : New Replacement Bios Chips or Re - Flash iCE Flashing iNC Windows Networking 0 10-16-2003 04:06 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11