Alex Heney wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:46:16 -0000, "·.¸¸.·´¯`Wango´¯`·.¸¸.·"
> <·.¸¸.·´¯`Wango´¯`·.¸¸.·@shotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/cgi-bin/n...EZFEyZOJUTJEDK
>>
>
> It would seem that "what happened to their integrity as an ISP" is
> that they got some.
>
> Integrity does NOT mean protecting any of your customers you know are
> breaking the law. In fact it means exactly the opposite.
I'm on Demon and I have first-hand experience of their policies regarding
illegal filesharing.
A few months back, Universal caught me sharing a TS of Bruce Almighty. They
emailed Demon, who opened an Abuse ticket about me, asked me politely to
stop sharing it and forwarded the original Universal email to me. I deleted
the file, informed them and Universal that I'd done it and everything was
fine.
It seems like Demon's basically doing the same thing they've been doing
previously, but saving themselves work by passing on the email address of
the offender instead of doing the work themselves.
Taking action against users for illegal filesharing is just upholding the
terms of their AUP.
I don't have a problem with Demons' decision and I'm not worried -
especially as the organisations doing the complaining have no legal rights
in the UK. They are also increasingly unsupported by EU law, the economical
reality, and their own people.
And why am I not surprised AOL is getting all gung-ho? AOL TIME WARNER, that
big entertainment conglomerate. Can't work that one out at all
--
Somebody sneaked in here and committed a neatness!
----------------------------------------
>> http://hedgewitch.blogspot.com <<
----------------------------------------