Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > ISP ADSL Ping Times & Bandwidth

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

ISP ADSL Ping Times & Bandwidth

 
 
PaulH
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 09:42 AM
As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
ping results on the following Jolt IP?

195.149.21.11

The name of the ISP and the average time would be sufficient.

Secondly, in general, does the actual bandwidth achieved compare with
the ISP's promise?

Cheers.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Peter Crosland
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 09:55 AM
You can test the actual speed here.

http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp

--
gee six jay en (E-Mail Removed)

Replace the words with the numbers to email me


 
Reply With Quote
 
It's me
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 10:05 AM
PaulH wrote:
> As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
> ping results on the following Jolt IP?
>
> 195.149.21.11
>
> The name of the ISP and the average time would be sufficient.


Both 1meg ADSL links..

From Pipex:
PING 195.149.21.11 (195.149.21.11): 56 octets data
64 octets from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=0 ttl=58 time=22.9 ms
64 octets from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=22.6 ms
64 octets from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=21.2 ms
64 octets from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=21.4 ms

From BT Internet:
PING 195.149.21.11 (195.149.21.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=33.6 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=37.3 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=35.5 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=36.5 ms
 
Reply With Quote
 
Sunil Sood
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 10:13 AM

"PaulH" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) m...
> As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
> ping results on the following Jolt IP?
>
> 195.149.21.11
>
> The name of the ISP and the average time would be sufficient.


From a BulldogDSL line...

Pinging 195.149.21.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14ms

> Secondly, in general, does the actual bandwidth achieved compare with
> the ISP's promise?


Yes, in fact you probably get more than you should.. if you take into
account its supposed to be a contended service etc

Regards
Sunil


 
Reply With Quote
 
Alastair
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 10:51 AM
"PaulH" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) m...
> As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
> ping results on the following Jolt IP?
>
> 195.149.21.11


AAISP 2M line
Pinging 195.149.21.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14ms


 
Reply With Quote
 
Alastair
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 10:53 AM
"PaulH" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) m...
> As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
> ping results on the following Jolt IP?
>
> 195.149.21.11


AAISP 512K line
Pinging 195.149.21.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 20ms


 
Reply With Quote
 
Alastair
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 11:53 AM
"PaulH" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) m...
> As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
> ping results on the following Jolt IP?
>
> 195.149.21.11


Just for fun, here are the figures for a 1Gbps line

Pinging 195.149.21.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 1ms


 
Reply With Quote
 
Baz
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 12:38 PM
"Sunil Sood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:c5j2sg$29pns$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> From a BulldogDSL line...
>


Also a Bulldog user.

Pinging 195.149.21.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 12ms


Same ping, using VisualRoute:
(apologies for line wrapping)

==================================================
=== VisualRoute report on 14-Apr-2004 13:31:55 ===
==================================================

Report for 195.149.21.11 [clarity.jolt.co.uk]

Analysis: '195.149.21.11' [clarity.jolt.co.uk] was found in 7 hops
(TTL=58).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
| Hop | %Loss | IP Address | Node Name |
Location | Tzone | ms | Graph | Network
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
| 0 | | 192.168.0.2 | xxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx | ...
| | | | (private use) |
| 1 | | 192.168.0.1 | xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx | ...
| | 0 | x---- | (private use) |
| 2 | | 212.158.xxx.x | host-212-158-xxx-x.bulldogdsl.com | ...
| | 10 | x---- | |
| 3 | | 83.146.xx.xx | host-83-146-xx-xx.bulldogdsl.com |
?(Netherlands) | +01:00 | 10 | x----- | RIPE Network Coordination Centre
83-RIPE |
| 4 | | 217.79.160.15 | lon1-10.nildram.net | London,
UK | * | 11 | x---- | pan-european internet exchange points
|
| 5 | | 195.149.20.130 | lon1-9.nildram.net | London,
UK | * | 16 | --x-- | Internal Network
|
| 6 | | 195.149.20.126 | jolt-gw.nildram.net | -
| | 15 | --x-- | Internal Network |
| 7 | | 195.149.21.11 | clarity.jolt.co.uk | -
| | 18 | ---x- | Jolt Gaming Service |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Roundtrip time to 195.149.21.11, average = 18ms, min = 10ms, max = 20ms --
14-Apr-2004 13:31:55


I've 'x'd out some of the finer details of my network/connection.


Baz


 
Reply With Quote
 
Dan
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 12:40 PM
On 14 Apr 2004 02:42:36 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) (PaulH) wrote:

>As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
>ping results on the following Jolt IP?
>
>195.149.21.11
>
>The name of the ISP and the average time would be sufficient.
>
>Secondly, in general, does the actual bandwidth achieved compare with
>the ISP's promise?
>
>Cheers.


Nildram 512k adsl:

PING 195.149.21.11 (195.149.21.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=26.1 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=19.1 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=20.3 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=19.0 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.11: icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=19.1 ms

--- 195.149.21.11 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4052ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.033/20.772/26.152/2.735 ms

 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark Turner
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2004, 01:12 PM
In article <(E-Mail Removed)> ,
PaulH <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>As all ISP's are not created equal would it be possible to get some
>ping results on the following Jolt IP?
>
>195.149.21.11
>
>The name of the ISP and the average time would be sufficient.


From an InterViVo 512Mb 50:1 line (Home 500 service), www.intervivo.net:

C:\Windows>ping 195.149.21.11

Pinging 195.149.21.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 15ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 15ms

>Secondly, in general, does the actual bandwidth achieved compare with
>the ISP's promise?


Works exactly as promised, but then I would say that 'cos I work there.

Cheers,

Mark.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Very long ping times and slow downloads on 1MB ADSL Martin Underwood Broadband 4 01-31-2007 03:47 PM
Wireless ADSL router & Gaming Ping times Matt Snowdon Home Networking 1 02-20-2004 03:13 PM
MN-700 ping times??? Knigh-tros Broadband Hardware 0 02-12-2004 12:33 PM
Ping times out Steve B. Windows Networking 11 01-06-2004 03:58 AM
Bad ping times on virgin ADSL nomoremadness Broadband 0 11-22-2003 08:07 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11