Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > IPSec VPN tunnel with hardware gateway

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

IPSec VPN tunnel with hardware gateway

 
 
Danny L
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-12-2004, 04:36 PM
Hi,

I am using a "classical" SBS 2003 setup with 2 NIC's - one to my
internal LAN and the other to a dlink di-604 router (no ISA).
I am trying to establish an *IPsec only* tunnel (pre-shared key) to a
3rd party VPN router (linksys, netgear, etc).
To do this, I have set up an IP security policy on the SBS server as
explained at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816514. Also, I have
enabled IPsec pass-through on the router and forwarded udp port 500
and 4500. Since the external NIC is set with RAS to do NAT, I also
opened these ports on the server.
Unfortunately I am unable to get this to work. I wonder if this kind
of set up is actually possible, since Windows 2003 supports NAT-T and
the router only supports IPsec pass-through. This brings me to yet
another question - is there a difference between IPsec pass-through
and NAT-T ?
The following is a log of an IPsec client I've been trying to use. I
should also mention that the initiating client is also behind a NAT
(no open ports though).

Initiating IKE Phase 1 (IP ADDR=212.189.15.221)
SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM (SA, VID 2x)
RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (SA, VID 3x)
Peer is IKE fragmentation capable
IKE fragmentation disabled
Peer is NAT-T draft-02 capable
SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM (KE, NON, NAT-D 2x, VID 3x)
RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (KE, NON, NAT-D 2x)
NAT is detected for Client and Peer
Floating to IKE non-500 port
SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM *(ID, HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_INITIAL_CONTACT)
RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (Retransmission)
SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM *(Retransmission)
RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (Retransmission)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ these retransmissions are the problem....
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jorge Coronel
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-13-2004, 12:23 AM
Hi Danny:
Let me see if I understood your scenario. You are trying to do a connection
from a client in the public side on the network to a server that is behind
tha NAT and to who´s IP you are forwaring UDP traffic port 500/4500 right?..
In this scenario your client has to be able to do NATT if it is a MS product
make sure you got the update necesary to do this; there is an update for XP
and Windows2000. Also make sure you are using policies without
Authentication Header this is a limitation of the NAT scenario .
I hope this helps...
Thanks
JC
"Danny L" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) om...
> Hi,
>
> I am using a "classical" SBS 2003 setup with 2 NIC's - one to my
> internal LAN and the other to a dlink di-604 router (no ISA).
> I am trying to establish an *IPsec only* tunnel (pre-shared key) to a
> 3rd party VPN router (linksys, netgear, etc).
> To do this, I have set up an IP security policy on the SBS server as
> explained at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816514. Also, I have
> enabled IPsec pass-through on the router and forwarded udp port 500
> and 4500. Since the external NIC is set with RAS to do NAT, I also
> opened these ports on the server.
> Unfortunately I am unable to get this to work. I wonder if this kind
> of set up is actually possible, since Windows 2003 supports NAT-T and
> the router only supports IPsec pass-through. This brings me to yet
> another question - is there a difference between IPsec pass-through
> and NAT-T ?
> The following is a log of an IPsec client I've been trying to use. I
> should also mention that the initiating client is also behind a NAT
> (no open ports though).
>
> Initiating IKE Phase 1 (IP ADDR=212.189.15.221)
> SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM (SA, VID 2x)
> RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (SA, VID 3x)
> Peer is IKE fragmentation capable
> IKE fragmentation disabled
> Peer is NAT-T draft-02 capable
> SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM (KE, NON, NAT-D 2x, VID 3x)
> RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (KE, NON, NAT-D 2x)
> NAT is detected for Client and Peer
> Floating to IKE non-500 port
> SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM *(ID, HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_INITIAL_CONTACT)
> RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (Retransmission)
> SENDING>>>> ISAKMP OAK MM *(Retransmission)
> RECEIVED<<< ISAKMP OAK MM (Retransmission)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ these retransmissions are the problem....



 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ipsec tunnel mode vs ip in ip with ipsec transport Reji Linux Networking 1 09-20-2011 04:29 PM
Two sites connected via hardware IPSec VPN Tunnel Ed Walker Windows Networking 2 03-15-2005 10:40 PM
NAT gateway and IPSec-tunnel on the same box - impossible? Johannes Mayr Windows Networking 2 09-24-2004 10:58 PM
Windows 2003 ipsec tunnel to third party hardware firewall? scott Windows Networking 1 03-01-2004 06:27 PM
2.6 IPSec tunnel mode gateway Abe Froman Linux Networking 2 02-21-2004 02:59 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11