"Kevin K" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:52492C11-6118-4A62-9DEE-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I've successfully used IPSec Policies to block specific devices and or ports
> from communicating with domain members.
>
> Now there's this new DNS server vulnerability -- one of the suggested
> methods is to use IPSec to block ports above 1024.
That would be insane,...plain rediculas,...why would anyone suggest something so
rediculas.
What difference does the so-called vulnerability make when your DNS is on the
internal LAN and not exposed to the Internat and is not the Publicly
Authoritative DNS for whatever Public Domain Name you have, and does not have
public machines/users querying it for resolution of your Public Domain Name?
Patch the machine with the patch when it is released and forget it.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft, or
anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------