"mhicaoidh" <®êmõvé_mhic_aoidh@hotÑîXmailSPäM.com> wrote in message
news:YKnYc.65153$9d6.64022@attbi_s54...
> Taking a moment's reflection, COVERS_IS_ON_MODEM mused:
> |
> | I hope someone can help me witha small problem i have ill try and
> | explain the setup i have as follows ...
>
> It's most likely Norton interfering. There should be a way to add
your
> LAN subnet to a trusted zone. I don't use Norton, so I cannot say
> specifically.
I'll second that: Norton's default is to block NetBIOS ports. You can either
add the ports to the excepted list, or allow all traffic from your local
subnet, but I recommend you do both, and allow _only_ NetBIOS (TCP ports
135, 137, 138, & 139) _only_ from your local subnet.
> Additionally, make sure you actually have something to share. Having
a
> printer is fine, but unless you make it an available share, the other
> computers won't see it. Same for folders.
>
> If you want remote access from one computer to another, I recommend
> UltraVNC ...
>
> http://ultravnc.sourceforge.net/faq.htm
VNC is a "screenscraper" program that duplicates the screen/keyboard/mouse
from another computer onto yours, i.e., it's the same idea as PCAnywhere.
Although I've found such programs useful for troubleshooting distant
machines, I don't favor them for everyday use, since I found I had to
constantly remind myself of which machine I was operating on and where the
files would be after the connection was broken. Having said that, I'll admit
that PCAnywhere/TightVNC/UltraVNC are more secure than having shares enabled
on Windows ME/98 machines, which don't have the security features found in
the NTFS file system, but since the OP runs XP, it isn't any issue here.
YMMV.
William
--
William Warren
(Filter noise from my address for direct replies.)