On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:51:32 +0100, Christian <news^@nerdbynature.de> wrote:
>so, you're sure, that pinging 165.9.185.4 really is *your* computer?
>(traceroute!)
Eh..yup. 'Cos only when I up the alias, then the IP would be pingable.
>
>if this is verified, routing issues should not be an issue any more.
>please have look if any services are actually bound to the new device:
>
>$ netstat -anp | grep \:110 # for pop3...
>
>what is the exact error mesage when you try to connect to a service?
# netstat -anp | grep \:25
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3202/sendmail: acce
tcp 0 0 165.9.185.4:25 219.74.12.123:1412 SYN_RECV -
It seems as though a connection is being attempted but the packets are not going back to the source
(219.74.12.123)?
Could it be possible that my linux server is using the wrong gateway to talk back to 219.74.12.123 ?
But funny things is, I can ping with the reply pings coming back.
Since I have two internet ifaces, I recall I think I did do 'something' to make the packets use the
correct gateways. I looked at my iptables script/ip route I can't find anything.
How would tell the linux server to use gateway '165.9.185.1' for packets coming into ip
'165.9.185.4'.
Thanks.
To e-mail, remove the obvious
|