Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Intel 2200BG Wifi / doesn't auto connect on powering on the machine / HP Laptop

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Intel 2200BG Wifi / doesn't auto connect on powering on the machine / HP Laptop

 
 
Michel S.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-08-2007, 07:16 PM
Hello !

A friend of mine is using an HP Laptop, Windows XP - Home, sp2, all
patches applied.

The wireless card is an Intel PRO 2200BG, using the latest drivers.

The software used to configure and connect is Intel's own Pro Wireless
Software.

Windows WZC is disabled and HP Wireless assistant is not used (there's
no other wireless device than the 2200BG on this machine).


The connection to the in house D-Link DI-624 router - using WPA2 PSK
with AES encryption - works very well once established, as long as the
PC is on. Even after being in sleep mode (which drops the connexion),
it is automatically reset upon getting out of sleep.

The problem is : once the user shuts down his machine, the connection
isn't reestablished automatically on next reboot, even if this
connexion is the only one on it's profile list.

Others connexions are detected in the neighbourhood, but the signal
strenght is weak and their SSID is not the sans as the in house router.

Also, the 2200BG MAC address is linked to a static IP adress in the
router's configuration.


I tried deleting this profile & recreating it from scratch, uninstall
& reinstall intel's software.. At no avail.

Any idea ? Suggestion ?


Thanks


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-09-2007, 06:58 AM
Michel S. <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:

>A friend of mine is using an HP Laptop, Windows XP - Home, sp2, all
>patches applied.


Any particular model HP laptop?

That would be XP SP2. When someone says "all patches applied" I
usually take that to mean all "critical updates" applied and none of
the optional ones that are NOT automatically installed under cover of
darkness. Try:
<http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com>
and select "Custom". When you're done, then tell me that you've
applied all the patches.

>The wireless card is an Intel PRO 2200BG, using the latest drivers.


The latest? Any clue what version? There were problems similar to
what you describe with the various Proset 9.x mutations. Instead of
using whatever HP offers, try the Intel version at:
<http://support.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/pro2200bg/index.htm>
The current version is 11.1.1.11 with a driver version of 9.0.4.36.

>The software used to configure and connect is Intel's own Pro Wireless
>Software.
>
>Windows WZC is disabled and HP Wireless assistant is not used (there's
>no other wireless device than the 2200BG on this machine).
>
>
>The connection to the in house D-Link DI-624 router - using WPA2 PSK
>with AES encryption - works very well once established, as long as the
>PC is on. Even after being in sleep mode (which drops the connexion),
>it is automatically reset upon getting out of sleep.
>
>The problem is : once the user shuts down his machine, the connection
>isn't reestablished automatically on next reboot, even if this
>connexion is the only one on it's profile list.
>
>Others connexions are detected in the neighbourhood, but the signal
>strenght is weak and their SSID is not the sans as the in house router.
>
>Also, the 2200BG MAC address is linked to a static IP adress in the
>router's configuration.


Both Wireless Zero Config and Proset have some kind of setting for
each connection profile that declares it to be a "connect
automatically". What happens if you have more than one of these set
is that when the client scans for available access points, it will
select the one that is nearest the top of the list of connection
profiles. It can easily be the wrong one. If it's set to connect
manually, it will not connect to anything until you manually select it
from the list of available networks.

If you only have one system in the connection list, and presumably
it's set to connect automatically, it should work. What I've noticed
on the latest Proset versions (11.1 and up) is that it takes perhaps
5-7 minutes for the client to establish a wireless connection on
bootup. It was quicker on earlier versions. Are you waiting long
enough?

>I tried deleting this profile & recreating it from scratch, uninstall
>& reinstall intel's software.. At no avail.
>
>Any idea ? Suggestion ?
>
>
>Thanks


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
Michel S.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-09-2007, 08:22 AM
Thanks for you reply Jeff, see my comments below..


Jeff Liebermann avait écrit le 2007-06-09 :
> Michel S. <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>
>> A friend of mine is using an HP Laptop, Windows XP - Home, sp2, all
>> patches applied.

>
> Any particular model HP laptop?


Pavilion dv4200 (precisely model dv4270ca)

>
> That would be XP SP2. When someone says "all patches applied" I
> usually take that to mean all "critical updates" applied and none of
> the optional ones that are NOT automatically installed under cover of
> darkness.


You are right : I mean all "critical updates" PLUS Hotfix KB893357
(which takes care of WPA2 and is not considered critical) applied. I
used the expression because WMP11, IE7 and .NET framework are not
"patches" IMHO.


>
>> The wireless card is an Intel PRO 2200BG, using the latest drivers.

>
> The latest? Any clue what version? There were problems similar to
> what you describe with the various Proset 9.x mutations. Instead of
> using whatever HP offers, try the Intel version at:
> <http://support.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/pro2200bg/index.htm>
> The current version is 11.1.1.11 with a driver version of 9.0.4.36.


The HP updated drivers weren't used at all.

Instead, the latest availiable on Intel's site at that time (3-4 weeks
ago) were used. (11.1.0.0_XP32, with driver version 9.0.4.33)

(BTW, I just checked and found that we are BOTH right : Intel's french
download site list the latest to be V11.1.1.0 with drivers 9.0.4.33 for
2200BG while the english version list the ones you specified.)

Unfortunately, the "Release Notes" doesn't list the issues corrected by
the newer version.

>> <snip>


>> The problem is : once the user shuts down his machine, the connection
>> isn't reestablished automatically on next reboot, even if this
>> connexion is the only one on it's profile list.
>>
>> Others connexions are detected in the neighbourhood, but the signal
>> strenght is weak and their SSID is not the sans as the in house router.
>>
>> Also, the 2200BG MAC address is linked to a static IP adress in the
>> router's configuration.

>
> Both Wireless Zero Config and Proset have some kind of setting for
> each connection profile that declares it to be a "connect
> automatically". What happens if you have more than one of these set
> is that when the client scans for available access points, it will
> select the one that is nearest the top of the list of connection
> profiles. It can easily be the wrong one.


In the case of WZC, it will not even find the right one if the SSID
broadcast is disabled. To make sure it was not the case with Intel's
software, we tried with both SSID broadcast enabled and disabled.

(Even if many say that disabling SSID broadcast gives no additional
security, I think that hiding it from the "average neighbour" will keep
them away from any temptation to use or tamper with the AP).


> If it's set to connect
> manually, it will not connect to anything until you manually select it
> from the list of available networks.


> If you only have one system in the connection list, and presumably
> it's set to connect automatically, it should work.


This is the only connexion configured in the profiles list and it is
set to automatically reconnect.


> What I've noticed
> on the latest Proset versions (11.1 and up) is that it takes perhaps
> 5-7 minutes for the client to establish a wireless connection on
> bootup. It was quicker on earlier versions. Are you waiting long
> enough?
>


Interesting !

Knowing my friend's patience, I'm sure he doesn't wait more than 45
seconds before giving up.. ;-)

Any idea why it is like this at bootup but not when coming out of sleep
mode (which takes only about 7-10 seconds to reconnect) ?

I'll check this with him over the week end and post back on this.


In the meantime :

a) do you think the 9.0.4.36 driver would make any difference over the
current 9.0.4.33 ?

b) if the longest bootup connect time was noticed only since the ProSet
11.1 - would it be a "good" idea to try installing the pre-11.1
software but leave the "latest" (current) drivers ?


Thanks again !!


 
Reply With Quote
 
kev
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-09-2007, 08:35 AM
Michel S. wrote:

>
> In the case of WZC, it will not even find the right one if the SSID
> broadcast is disabled. To make sure it was not the case with Intel's
> software, we tried with both SSID broadcast enabled and disabled.
>

Have you tried installing kb917021 and then using the "Connect even if
the network is not broadcasting" option ?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917021
 
Reply With Quote
 
Michel S.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-09-2007, 08:54 AM
Thanks for pointing me there Kev..

After a glance at the article, I have 2 additional questions:

1) How exactly did you find the existence of this patch ? It's not
listed on "Custom" pathes availiable under windows update (at least,
not the French version) even after the KB893357 update is installed..

(And I found about KB893357 after Googling a couple of hours, not by WU
!)


2) Do I correctly understand that this patch applies only if WZC is
used to connect to the WiFi lan ?

Thanks again !


kev avait soumis l'idée :
> Michel S. wrote:
>
>>
>> In the case of WZC, it will not even find the right one if the SSID
>> broadcast is disabled. To make sure it was not the case with Intel's
>> software, we tried with both SSID broadcast enabled and disabled.
>>

> Have you tried installing kb917021 and then using the "Connect even if the
> network is not broadcasting" option ?
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917021



 
Reply With Quote
 
kev
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-09-2007, 08:58 AM
Michel S. wrote:
> Thanks for pointing me there Kev..
>
> After a glance at the article, I have 2 additional questions:
>
> 1) How exactly did you find the existence of this patch ? It's not
> listed on "Custom" pathes availiable under windows update (at least, not
> the French version) even after the KB893357 update is installed..


One of the family was doing some "homework" on ad-hoc networks and it
came up while he was doing some research.
>
> (And I found about KB893357 after Googling a couple of hours, not by WU !)
>
>
> 2) Do I correctly understand that this patch applies only if WZC is used
> to connect to the WiFi lan ?


Yes

>
> Thanks again !
>
>
> kev avait soumis l'idée :
>> Michel S. wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In the case of WZC, it will not even find the right one if the SSID
>>> broadcast is disabled. To make sure it was not the case with
>>> Intel's software, we tried with both SSID broadcast enabled and
>>> disabled.
>>>

>> Have you tried installing kb917021 and then using the "Connect even if
>> the network is not broadcasting" option ?
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917021

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-09-2007, 05:45 PM
Michel S. <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:

>You are right : I mean all "critical updates" PLUS Hotfix KB893357
>(which takes care of WPA2 and is not considered critical) applied. I
>used the expression because WMP11, IE7 and .NET framework are not
>"patches" IMHO.


I usually install literally everything. It sometime gets me into
trouble, especially when it offers a new device driver, but usually
works better than when an update is missing.

Incidentally, I also see far too many failed updates, where the update
is downloaded, but didn't install correctly. This usually requires
manual corrective action (hacking and cursing) and is not corrected by
Windoze update. I use Belarc Advisor (free) at:
<http://www.belarc.com>
which lists updated downloaded, installed, and missing. I've fixed
quite a few W2K and XP problems by simply re-downloading and
re-installing the update.

>The HP updated drivers weren't used at all.


Good, because they're usually a month or two behind the development
curve. With the newly re-written wireless stack in Vista, many
previously un-addressed wireless driver and connection manager related
issues seem to be appearing. In an effort to keep XP and Vista
synchronized, many driver writers are using this as an opertunity to
update their XP drivers at the same time as their Vista driver.

>> Both Wireless Zero Config and Proset have some kind of setting for
>> each connection profile that declares it to be a "connect
>> automatically". What happens if you have more than one of these set
>> is that when the client scans for available access points, it will
>> select the one that is nearest the top of the list of connection
>> profiles. It can easily be the wrong one.

>
>In the case of WZC, it will not even find the right one if the SSID
>broadcast is disabled. To make sure it was not the case with Intel's
>software, we tried with both SSID broadcast enabled and disabled.


Old bugs seem to return. Both WZC, Proset, and probably a bunch of
others will not detect access points that don't broadcast their SSID.
Incidentally, some of Netgear client managers will detect
non-broadcasting AP's. Last time I checked, both WZC and Proset will
connect to AP's that don't broacast, if you supply the correct SSID.
However, there were bugs in the past with this feature. I vaguely
recall that one of them is that the client would connect to a
non-broadcasting AP, but it would not roam or re-connect.

>(Even if many say that disabling SSID broadcast gives no additional
>security, I think that hiding it from the "average neighbour" will keep
>them away from any temptation to use or tamper with the AP).


They will accidentally land on your RF channel because they can't
"see" your system.

>This is the only connexion configured in the profiles list and it is
>set to automatically reconnect.


Good. Also, in Proset, there's a setting somewhere for how
aggressively the client should try to reconnect. It think it's under
roaming settings. It has a side effect of causing constant
connect/reconnect cycles if too aggressive in finding a better access
point, and seems to have an affect on connecting coming out of
hibernation. Sorry, I don't have a machine with Proset handy.

>Knowing my friend's patience, I'm sure he doesn't wait more than 45
>seconds before giving up.. ;-)


It was weird. Unfortunately, I never bothered to time how long or
investigate the cause. On boot, the laptop would boot normally in
about 90 seconds. All the multitude of programs that want to check
for updates would lurk silently in the background, waiting for the
internet connection. It was very obvious when it would finally
connect as the machine came to almost a halt as all these programs
would almost simultaneously either announce their intentions or beg
for comfirmation. What was suprising was how long it would take. My
guess is 5-7 minutes. I sometimes got impatient and would use WZC to
"view available networks" and connect manually. As I recall, that
would only take a few seconds (although the scan for networks was slow
when faced with a large number of access points).

>Any idea why it is like this at bootup but not when coming out of sleep
>mode (which takes only about 7-10 seconds to reconnect) ?


No, but I have a bad guess. Coming out of sleep mode, it probably
asks for a DHCP renewal. If it's less than 24 hours since the lease
was originally issued, it will probably get the lease the first time,
every time. However, when it requests a new lease, which may be a
problem if the AP thinks it previously had issued one. My guess is
that it's probing the network, looking for other devices that may
represent a duplicated IP, and only after some timeout, elects to
issue a new lease.

However, you seem to be having problems with the initial association
on boot, not the subsequent authentication or DHCP. Proset has some
diagnostic logging built in. Try using the logs and see where the
delays are buried.

Also, WZC has debugging and logging. See:
<http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/wifi/wlansupp.mspx>
You may not be able to decode what's going on in the driver or WZC,
but you can see by the date/time stamps, where the delays are buried.

>a) do you think the 9.0.4.36 driver would make any difference over the
>current 9.0.4.33 ?


I don't know. Without a bug list, it's difficult to determine. I
always like the latest drivers. New bugs are far more entertaining
than old bugs.

>b) if the longest bootup connect time was noticed only since the ProSet
>11.1 - would it be a "good" idea to try installing the pre-11.1
>software but leave the "latest" (current) drivers ?


No, stay with the latest and save the stuff that will make a mess of
the registry for last. Most driver and application writers do not
test for downward revisions. Methinks you're asking for problems.

>Thanks again !!


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
Unk
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-11-2007, 04:01 AM
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:16:32 -0400, Michel S. <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Hello !
>
>A friend of mine is using an HP Laptop, Windows XP - Home, sp2, all
>patches applied.
>
>The wireless card is an Intel PRO 2200BG, using the latest drivers.
>
>The software used to configure and connect is Intel's own Pro Wireless
>Software.
>
>Windows WZC is disabled and HP Wireless assistant is not used (there's
>no other wireless device than the 2200BG on this machine).
>
>
>The connection to the in house D-Link DI-624 router - using WPA2 PSK
>with AES encryption - works very well once established, as long as the
>PC is on. Even after being in sleep mode (which drops the connexion),
>it is automatically reset upon getting out of sleep.
>
>The problem is : once the user shuts down his machine, the connection
>isn't reestablished automatically on next reboot, even if this
>connexion is the only one on it's profile list.
>
>Others connexions are detected in the neighbourhood, but the signal
>strenght is weak and their SSID is not the sans as the in house router.
>
>Also, the 2200BG MAC address is linked to a static IP adress in the
>router's configuration.
>
>
>I tried deleting this profile & recreating it from scratch, uninstall
>& reinstall intel's software.. At no avail.
>
>Any idea ? Suggestion ?
>
>
>Thanks
>


In addition to what others have suggested, try a TCP/IP repair:
http://www.dissoft.com/XP-TCPIP-Repair-7171.html

Or a WinSock repair: (2 tools)
http://www.snapfiles.com/get/winsockxpfix.html
and
http://www.cexx.org/lspfix.htm

These have worked for me more times than I can remember...



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel 2200bg Wireless Adaptor Slow To Connect Jeff Gaines Home Networking 0 09-09-2007 01:40 PM
Two desktop computers connect to Buffalo WHR-HP-G54, but laptop doesn't... loveunderlined Wireless Internet 0 08-28-2007 02:17 AM
LINUX + Intel 2200BG WiFi Detection & Connecting DELL Inspiron 9200 LAPTOP MontyW Wireless Internet 2 03-03-2007 11:01 AM
Intel PRO/2200bg problems - can't connect with office or home Wireless LAN JS Wireless Networks 2 01-06-2007 11:47 AM
Laptop doesn't connect to internet Jaymo Broadband Hardware 1 05-31-2004 02:29 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11