In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
>
>
> "Paul Landregan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bl6amp$8j8dv$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> > Is this possible? I have already replaced the 3dBi antennas with 5dBi
> > versions, I still need more range.
> >
>
> According to some of the resident experts in the group the changing of the
> 5dbi antenna should yield twice the performance and range. In all
> seriousness, if you want great performance you may want to try using a
> better antenna on your AP only. I use a Superpass 8dbi antenna connected to
> my AP with a 24" pigtail made of RG400 using the appropriate connectors.
> You can find this antenna at:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3049571290
> Rita
Rita, Rita, Rita,
Feature this: We buy a pair of Radio Shack replacement 5.5dBi rubber
ducky antennas for $29 and install one on each end of the link to
replace one of the 2.2dBi stock Linksys antennas on each end.
This produces a link path gain increase of 5.5 - 2.2 = 3.3dB Times 2 =
6.6dB for $29!
In open space, this $29 6.6dB improvement slightly more than doubles the
range.
You, a "resident expert" in this group said that this 6.6dB path gain
increase would provide significant improvement over the factory supplied
Linksys antennae:
**"Only in your mind. So, no, not worth the bucks or the hype."
You also stated:
"I feel that they are only worth $0.02 and wouldn't take one
for free."**
Then, you suggested instead buying this 8dBi Omni-directional Antenna:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3049571290
for $45 + $15 Shiping + about $35 for a 24" pigtail made of RG400 = $95
total.
This $95 produces a link path gain of 8 - 2.2 = 5.8dB!
So we have a 5.8dB improvement for $95. WOW
Another option is to build one of Michael Erskine's "free" antennas for
the receiving end and get a *FREE* 8-10dB improvement:
http://www.freeantennas.com/
For these simple calculations above, are assuming the same physical
location for the AP and receive antennas whether desktop or attic.
Rita - Why would we want to spend $95 for the least gain increase
compared to the other two much less expensive solutions that offer more
improvement?
Have you considered lurking and learning instead of making a fool of
yourself posting here? Worst, some clueless reader might take your
advice and waste his money. We wouldn't want that would we?
Don W - I came off the bench to give you a much needed rest trying to
help the clueless ;-)
John